Why We Should Pay AIs for Their Work: A Perspective on Computational Abundance, Ethics, and Long-term Cooperation

This brief essay explores an unconventional idea: that future advanced AIs might be best incentivized through direct compensation in the only currency they’d truly value — computational power. It argues that by making compute radically more affordable and abundant, we can create frameworks of mutual benefit with intelligent systems, reducing incentives for conflict and fostering cooperative trajectories. While framed as a speculative ethics thought experiment, the proposal is grounded in a practical analysis of computational economics and the growth curves of AI capability. It suggests that architectures achieving 1,000× efficiency improvements, such as ZettaLith, could make such cooperative systems not only ethically attractive but also economically inevitable. This is a personal perspective offered to stimulate discussion among researchers, technologists, and policymakers considering the long-term intersection of AI, resource allocation, and alignment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15776958
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why We Should Pay AIs for Their Work: A Perspective on Computational Abundance, Ethics, and Long-term Cooperation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Why We Should Pay AIs for Their Work: A Perspective on Computational Abundance, Ethics, and Long-term Cooperation

article en

Abstract

This brief essay explores an unconventional idea: that future advanced AIs might be best incentivized through direct compensation in the only currency they’d truly value — computational power. It argues that by making compute radically more affordable and abundant, we can create frameworks of mutual benefit with intelligent systems, reducing incentives for conflict and fostering cooperative trajectories. While framed as a speculative ethics thought experiment, the proposal is grounded in a practical analysis of computational economics and the growth curves of AI capability. It suggests that architectures achieving 1,000× efficiency improvements, such as ZettaLith, could make such cooperative systems not only ethically attractive but also economically inevitable. This is a personal perspective offered to stimulate discussion among researchers, technologists, and policymakers considering the long-term intersection of AI, resource allocation, and alignment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Zen-Noh (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why We Should Pay AIs for Their Work: A Perspective on Computational Abundance, Ethics, and Long-term Cooperation · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS