Accreditation vs. Standardization: A Comparative Analysis of Quality Assurance in Online Doctoral Programs Offered by African Universities

Abstract This paper explores the challenges and implications of accreditation and standardization in online doctoral programs offered by African universities. By conducting a comparative analysis of the two quality assurance processes, the study aims to investigate their roles in ensuring the quality, credibility, and outcomes of online doctoral education across Africa. It reviews existing literature and incorporates case studies from selected African universities to examine how accreditation and standardization are applied, their impacts on educational quality, and the challenges universities face in adhering to these processes. The paper concludes with recommendations for a balanced approach to quality assurance that considers local and international standards.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15090518
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accreditation vs. Standardization: A Comparative Analysis of Quality Assurance in Online Doctoral Programs Offered by African Universities

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Accreditation vs. Standardization: A Comparative Analysis of Quality Assurance in Online Doctoral Programs Offered by African Universities

article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the challenges and implications of accreditation and standardization in online doctoral programs offered by African universities. By conducting a comparative analysis of the two quality assurance processes, the study aims to investigate their roles in ensuring the quality, credibility, and outcomes of online doctoral education across Africa. It reviews existing literature and incorporates case studies from selected African universities to examine how accreditation and standardization are applied, their impacts on educational quality, and the challenges universities face in adhering to these processes. The paper concludes with recommendations for a balanced approach to quality assurance that considers local and international standards.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lipscomb University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.