Type-2 Neutrosophic Sets (T2NSs) for Quality Evaluation of Project-Based Art and Design Courses: Evaluation Seven Projects

Conflicting objectives for alternatives must be valued in a decision-making process, and the optimal option must be chosen based on the decision-makers requirements. For this selection, multi-objective optimization techniques might offer a solution. The purpose of this study is to introduce two relatively new multi-objective optimization techniques: multi-objective optimization based on simple ratio analysis (MOOSRA) and Entropy methods. This study uses the multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM) to evaluate the project-based art and design courses. The entropy method is used to compute the criteria weights and the MOOSRA method is used to rank the alternatives. The MCDM method is used under the type-2 neutrosophic sets (T2NSs) to deal with vague and uncertain information. A case study with 14 criteria and seven projects are used in this study. The results show that Graphic Design Projects have the highest rank and the Product & Industrial Design has the lowest rank. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the different ranks of alternatives.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14810875
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Type-2 Neutrosophic Sets (T2NSs) for Quality Evaluation of Project-Based Art and Design Courses: Evaluation Seven Projects

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Type-2 Neutrosophic Sets (T2NSs) for Quality Evaluation of Project-Based Art and Design Courses: Evaluation Seven Projects

article en

Abstract

Conflicting objectives for alternatives must be valued in a decision-making process, and the optimal option must be chosen based on the decision-makers requirements. For this selection, multi-objective optimization techniques might offer a solution. The purpose of this study is to introduce two relatively new multi-objective optimization techniques: multi-objective optimization based on simple ratio analysis (MOOSRA) and Entropy methods. This study uses the multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM) to evaluate the project-based art and design courses. The entropy method is used to compute the criteria weights and the MOOSRA method is used to rank the alternatives. The MCDM method is used under the type-2 neutrosophic sets (T2NSs) to deal with vague and uncertain information. A case study with 14 criteria and seven projects are used in this study. The results show that Graphic Design Projects have the highest rank and the Product & Industrial Design has the lowest rank. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the different ranks of alternatives.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Type-2 Neutrosophic Sets (T2NSs) for Quality Evaluation of Project-Based Art and Design Courses: Evaluation Seven Projects · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS