WILL IT BE FAIR TO RESTORE THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN?

This article explores the debate over the possible reinstatement of the death penaltyin Uzbekistan in response to particularly serious crimes. According to a decree bythe first President of Uzbekistan, Islam Karimov, the death penalty was abolished inUzbekistan in 2008 and replaced with life imprisonment and long-termimprisonment, but recent high-profile criminal cases have reignited discussionsabout its return. Supporters argue that capital punishment serves as just retributionfor heinous crimes and an effective deterrent against recidivism. However,opponents emphasize humanitarian principles, the risk of judicial errors, andinternational legal obligations. Global statistics indicate that the death penalty doesnot significantly reduce crime and often leads to wrongful convictions. Moreover,maintaining a life sentence is economically more viable than capital punishment dueto legal expenses. Ultimately, the article concludes that the abolition of the deathpenalty aligns with modern legal and ethical standards, reinforcing Uzbekistan’scommitment to human rights and justice.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15074996
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WILL IT BE FAIR TO RESTORE THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

WILL IT BE FAIR TO RESTORE THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN?

article en

Abstract

This article explores the debate over the possible reinstatement of the death penaltyin Uzbekistan in response to particularly serious crimes. According to a decree bythe first President of Uzbekistan, Islam Karimov, the death penalty was abolished inUzbekistan in 2008 and replaced with life imprisonment and long-termimprisonment, but recent high-profile criminal cases have reignited discussionsabout its return. Supporters argue that capital punishment serves as just retributionfor heinous crimes and an effective deterrent against recidivism. However,opponents emphasize humanitarian principles, the risk of judicial errors, andinternational legal obligations. Global statistics indicate that the death penalty doesnot significantly reduce crime and often leads to wrongful convictions. Moreover,maintaining a life sentence is economically more viable than capital punishment dueto legal expenses. Ultimately, the article concludes that the abolition of the deathpenalty aligns with modern legal and ethical standards, reinforcing Uzbekistan’scommitment to human rights and justice.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

WILL IT BE FAIR TO RESTORE THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN? · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS