Effects of Agricultural Carbon Sources On Water Quality and Phytoplankton Community Composition in Flocponic System

Carbon products promote aggregate floc-rich plankton, with diverse roles in flocponic production. Availability, low-cost, and chemical composition of agricultural by-products make them ideal substrates for phytoplankton production. Phytoplankton maintains water quality by reducing toxic substances, but it is problematic under some conditions. Therefore, the study evaluates how agricultural carbon sources affect flocponic phytoplankton community composition and water quality. Five treatments (wheat-bran, Rhodes-hay, maize-cob, maize-stables, and lucerne-hay) and a control (no by-product) were employed in a complete randomized design, each in triplicate for nine weeks. Each treatment and control had Nile tilapia (0.155±0.01g) and rice (seeds) densities of 98 m-3 and 250 m-2, respectively. Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and salinity levels did not differ significantly between treatments and control. However, TDS, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate showed significant differences (p<0.05) between treatments and control. Lucerne-hay exhibited the highest nitrate levels (0.9 ± 0.06 mg L-1), SRP (0.6 ± 0.05 mg L-1), and the lowest ammonia and nitrite levels compared to other treatments and control. Lucerne-hay had the highest phytoplankton diversity (2.48), while the control (1.37) had the least. Further, there were significant differences in phytoplankton abundance, with lucerne-hay having the highest Charophyta (1.45 ± 0.02 indsL-1), Chlorophyta (1.60 ± 0.02 indsL-1), and Ochrophyta (1.64 ± 0.03 indsL-1) abundance, while the control had the least. The result of the study revealed that carbon sources influence flocponic water quality and phytoplankton. The composition and solubility of lucerne-hay and wheat-bran may have improved water quality and phytoplankton. The study suggests that lucerne-hay and wheat-bran are the best flocponic carbon sources for phytoplankton and water quality.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15255364
Primary Topic
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Agricultural Carbon Sources On Water Quality and Phytoplankton Community Composition in Flocponic System

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
article

Effects of Agricultural Carbon Sources On Water Quality and Phytoplankton Community Composition in Flocponic System

article en

Abstract

Carbon products promote aggregate floc-rich plankton, with diverse roles in flocponic production. Availability, low-cost, and chemical composition of agricultural by-products make them ideal substrates for phytoplankton production. Phytoplankton maintains water quality by reducing toxic substances, but it is problematic under some conditions. Therefore, the study evaluates how agricultural carbon sources affect flocponic phytoplankton community composition and water quality. Five treatments (wheat-bran, Rhodes-hay, maize-cob, maize-stables, and lucerne-hay) and a control (no by-product) were employed in a complete randomized design, each in triplicate for nine weeks. Each treatment and control had Nile tilapia (0.155±0.01g) and rice (seeds) densities of 98 m-3 and 250 m-2, respectively. Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and salinity levels did not differ significantly between treatments and control. However, TDS, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate showed significant differences (p<0.05) between treatments and control. Lucerne-hay exhibited the highest nitrate levels (0.9 ± 0.06 mg L-1), SRP (0.6 ± 0.05 mg L-1), and the lowest ammonia and nitrite levels compared to other treatments and control. Lucerne-hay had the highest phytoplankton diversity (2.48), while the control (1.37) had the least. Further, there were significant differences in phytoplankton abundance, with lucerne-hay having the highest Charophyta (1.45 ± 0.02 indsL-1), Chlorophyta (1.60 ± 0.02 indsL-1), and Ochrophyta (1.64 ± 0.03 indsL-1) abundance, while the control had the least. The result of the study revealed that carbon sources influence flocponic water quality and phytoplankton. The composition and solubility of lucerne-hay and wheat-bran may have improved water quality and phytoplankton. The study suggests that lucerne-hay and wheat-bran are the best flocponic carbon sources for phytoplankton and water quality.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Eldoret (KE), Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (KE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of Agricultural Carbon Sources On Water Quality and Phytoplankton Community Composition in Flocponic System · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS