Determination of The Principles of Justice in Judge's Decisions Against Law Enforcement Officers Who Commit Corruption Crimes (Case Study Ruling No: 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI)

This research paper raises the topic of a corruption case committed by a law enforcement officer in case study Number: 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT.DKI), namely a prosecutor whose sentence was given by the judge due to non-juridical aspects, namely a mother who has a toddler and is breastfeeding. In fact, corruption is an extraordinary form of crime or is called an extraordinary crime. Corruption causes enormous state losses. So that corruption committed by law enforcement officers must be punished in accordance with Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. Even Article 52 of the Criminal Code regulates the aggravation of criminal penalties for civil servants or officials who commit crimes. This aggravation of criminal penalties can be in the form of additional additional penalties from the main sentence. The research method used is normative legal research or literature research, meaning that this research is based on literature sources to discuss the problems that have been formulated. The consideration of non-juridical aspects that dominate the sentence reduction is clearly not in line with the basic principles of justice and the goal of eradicating corruption. By enforcing criminal law for law enforcement officers who commit corruption, the goal of punishment will be achieved, namely that the perpetrators are deterred and do not repeat their actions and are not imitated by others.