Navigating Political and Practical Barriers to Open Science in Europe and Switzerland

Many stakeholders in science policy have demonstrated a strong commitment to open science over the past decade. However, this commitment contrasts with the reality, where a comprehensive and effective open science framework is still lacking. This talk focuses on political and practical challenges faced by open science in Europe, and how they are (not) met in Switzerland. While the benefits of open science are widely acknowledged, implementation is hampered by varying national policies, coordination gaps, and limited integration of open science into research assessments. Realizing open science and open data requires a coherent and efficient interplay of platforms, services, standards, and policies. Increasingly, discussions also highlight concerns over data protection and national interests, which may limit openness and require striking a balance between openness and limiting access. Furthermore, disparities in funding and resources across institutions lead to uneven adoption of open science. Scientific developments are often based on bottom-up initiatives and mechanisms to steer such bottom-up prioritization and funding are well developed in many countries and at the European level. For putting a conclusive open science framework in place, a bottom-up approach is not sufficient, top-down steering is also required. However, such top-down steering mechanisms and even more harmonizing such steering with allowing for community driven initiatives are even less established.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14697266
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Political and Practical Barriers to Open Science in Europe and Switzerland

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Navigating Political and Practical Barriers to Open Science in Europe and Switzerland

article en

Abstract

Many stakeholders in science policy have demonstrated a strong commitment to open science over the past decade. However, this commitment contrasts with the reality, where a comprehensive and effective open science framework is still lacking. This talk focuses on political and practical challenges faced by open science in Europe, and how they are (not) met in Switzerland. While the benefits of open science are widely acknowledged, implementation is hampered by varying national policies, coordination gaps, and limited integration of open science into research assessments. Realizing open science and open data requires a coherent and efficient interplay of platforms, services, standards, and policies. Increasingly, discussions also highlight concerns over data protection and national interests, which may limit openness and require striking a balance between openness and limiting access. Furthermore, disparities in funding and resources across institutions lead to uneven adoption of open science. Scientific developments are often based on bottom-up initiatives and mechanisms to steer such bottom-up prioritization and funding are well developed in many countries and at the European level. For putting a conclusive open science framework in place, a bottom-up approach is not sufficient, top-down steering is also required. However, such top-down steering mechanisms and even more harmonizing such steering with allowing for community driven initiatives are even less established.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.