Toward Educational Excellence: A Comprehensive Measuring of Ideological and Political Theory Courses in Universities using Neutrosophic Z-Rough Numbers

In the evolving landscape of higher education, ideological and political theory courses play a vital role in cultivating critical thinking, national identity, and civic responsibility among university students. This study develops a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for evaluating the effectiveness and quality of such courses. Twelve criteria, encompassing pedagogical innovation, theoretical clarity, emotional resonance, and student engagement, are employed to assess ten selected course models. This study uses the MABAC method to rank the alternatives. We use the Neutrosophic Z-Rough Numbers to overcome uncertainty and vague information. The evaluation reveals the multifaceted dimensions that contribute to the perceived success of ideological education and highlights areas requiring enhancement. The results provide a foundation for curriculum improvement, aligning instructional delivery with contemporary societal values and learning needs.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15238803
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Educational Excellence: A Comprehensive Measuring of Ideological and Political Theory Courses in Universities using Neutrosophic Z-Rough Numbers

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Toward Educational Excellence: A Comprehensive Measuring of Ideological and Political Theory Courses in Universities using Neutrosophic Z-Rough Numbers

article en

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of higher education, ideological and political theory courses play a vital role in cultivating critical thinking, national identity, and civic responsibility among university students. This study develops a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for evaluating the effectiveness and quality of such courses. Twelve criteria, encompassing pedagogical innovation, theoretical clarity, emotional resonance, and student engagement, are employed to assess ten selected course models. This study uses the MABAC method to rank the alternatives. We use the Neutrosophic Z-Rough Numbers to overcome uncertainty and vague information. The evaluation reveals the multifaceted dimensions that contribute to the perceived success of ideological education and highlights areas requiring enhancement. The results provide a foundation for curriculum improvement, aligning instructional delivery with contemporary societal values and learning needs.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.