An Evaluation Method for University Classroom Education Quality under Machine Vision and Single-Valued Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Set Environment

With the advancement of artificial intelligence, machine vision offers a novel approach to university teaching quality evaluation (TQE). However, existing studies are often hindered by subjectivity and lack of standardized evaluation methods, which impede accurate assessment of student learning effectiveness. Therefore, this study addresses these limitations by proposing a TQE framework that integrates machine vision with single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy sets (SVNHFSs). Specifically, the main contributions of this study are as follows. First, this study innovatively employs machine vision to capture student learning behaviors, constructing a classroom behavior matrix that serves as the foundation for evaluation. Second, this study introduces a combined weighting method, leveraging both the entropy weight method and the Criteria Importance Through Inter-Criteria Correlation (CRITIC) weight method, to assign weights to different time-points during the classes. Third, the SVNHFS is utilized to construct a classroom behavior evaluation matrix, and the single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy weighted average (SVNHFWA) operator is applied for weighting. In addition, the cosine measure is employed to rank time-points based on both ideal and non-ideal solutions, obtaining the optimal and non-optimal learning effectiveness periods. Finally, a case study confirms the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model, offering a robust method for evaluating university education quality.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13997087
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation Method for University Classroom Education Quality under Machine Vision and Single-Valued Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Set Environment

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

An Evaluation Method for University Classroom Education Quality under Machine Vision and Single-Valued Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Set Environment

article en

Abstract

With the advancement of artificial intelligence, machine vision offers a novel approach to university teaching quality evaluation (TQE). However, existing studies are often hindered by subjectivity and lack of standardized evaluation methods, which impede accurate assessment of student learning effectiveness. Therefore, this study addresses these limitations by proposing a TQE framework that integrates machine vision with single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy sets (SVNHFSs). Specifically, the main contributions of this study are as follows. First, this study innovatively employs machine vision to capture student learning behaviors, constructing a classroom behavior matrix that serves as the foundation for evaluation. Second, this study introduces a combined weighting method, leveraging both the entropy weight method and the Criteria Importance Through Inter-Criteria Correlation (CRITIC) weight method, to assign weights to different time-points during the classes. Third, the SVNHFS is utilized to construct a classroom behavior evaluation matrix, and the single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy weighted average (SVNHFWA) operator is applied for weighting. In addition, the cosine measure is employed to rank time-points based on both ideal and non-ideal solutions, obtaining the optimal and non-optimal learning effectiveness periods. Finally, a case study confirms the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model, offering a robust method for evaluating university education quality.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.