THE ROLE OF ERROR CORRECTION IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT FEEDBACK

Error correction is a crucial element in second language acquisition, especially in the development of accurate grammatical and writing skills. This study explores the impact of two major types of error correction—direct and indirect—on the writing performance of intermediate EFL learners. Thirty students were divided into two groups and exposed to different feedback strategies over six weeks. The first group received direct corrections, while the second group received underlined errors with metalinguistic clues. Pre- and post-tests, along with weekly writing assignments, were used to assess improvements. The results showed that while both methods led to significant learning gains, direct correction had a stronger impact on short-term grammatical accuracy, whereas indirect correction encouraged deeper cognitive engagement and long-term retention. These findings suggest that combining both methods could be an effective strategy for language instructors aiming to improve both accuracy and learner autonomy

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15342621
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE ROLE OF ERROR CORRECTION IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT FEEDBACK

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

THE ROLE OF ERROR CORRECTION IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT FEEDBACK

article en

Abstract

Error correction is a crucial element in second language acquisition, especially in the development of accurate grammatical and writing skills. This study explores the impact of two major types of error correction—direct and indirect—on the writing performance of intermediate EFL learners. Thirty students were divided into two groups and exposed to different feedback strategies over six weeks. The first group received direct corrections, while the second group received underlined errors with metalinguistic clues. Pre- and post-tests, along with weekly writing assignments, were used to assess improvements. The results showed that while both methods led to significant learning gains, direct correction had a stronger impact on short-term grammatical accuracy, whereas indirect correction encouraged deeper cognitive engagement and long-term retention. These findings suggest that combining both methods could be an effective strategy for language instructors aiming to improve both accuracy and learner autonomy

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.