Emerging Methodologists Workshop: Introduction to the Symposium

Healthy social science disciplines require and encourage the continuous evolution and development of methods for conducting research. As the empirical world evolves, and as scholars study new problems, and bring new perspectives to bear on existing ones, they must innovate methodologically, or depend on the methodological innovations introduced by other scholars. Unfortunately, the groups of scholars who develop, write on, and teach research methods in our discipline continue to lack a key source of this innovation: scholars from under-represented groups (Achen 2014, Shames and Wise 2017, Barnes 2018). In part this lack of diversity results from a “pipeline problem” in which junior scholars from under-represented groups who are interested in and talented with methods are not encouraged and actively mentored to develop existing or new methods, publish methodological scholarship, or teach methods.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14062803
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emerging Methodologists Workshop: Introduction to the Symposium

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Emerging Methodologists Workshop: Introduction to the Symposium

article en

Abstract

Healthy social science disciplines require and encourage the continuous evolution and development of methods for conducting research. As the empirical world evolves, and as scholars study new problems, and bring new perspectives to bear on existing ones, they must innovate methodologically, or depend on the methodological innovations introduced by other scholars. Unfortunately, the groups of scholars who develop, write on, and teach research methods in our discipline continue to lack a key source of this innovation: scholars from under-represented groups (Achen 2014, Shames and Wise 2017, Barnes 2018). In part this lack of diversity results from a “pipeline problem” in which junior scholars from under-represented groups who are interested in and talented with methods are not encouraged and actively mentored to develop existing or new methods, publish methodological scholarship, or teach methods.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Georgetown University (US), Temple College (US), Temple University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Emerging Methodologists Workshop: Introduction to the Symposium · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS