Comparison of Results of Glucometer and Laboratory Technique for Glucose Measurement Among Children

Objective: To compare results of glucometer and laboratory technique for glucose measurement among children. Study design: Cross sectional study Duration and place of study: 6 months from July 2021 to January 2022, department of child health KTH Peshawar. Methodology: 112 children presenting in outpatient department (OPD) for screening were enrolled in the study after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Blood samples were drawn for measurement of blood glucose both by glucometer and laboratory. The values measured were analysed and diagnostic accuracy was calculated along with correlation between these two techniques. Results: Out of 112 patients, 47 (42%) were females and 65 (58%) were males. The frequency of diabetes at screening clinic of our settings came out to be 15.2% (17 patients). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of glucometer was 84%, 94% and 82% respectively. The mean fasting blood sugar measured with glucometer was 115.37 ± 21.10 and that of laboratory measured was 97.85 ± 25.55. The mean difference of blood glucose measured with both the methods was 17.5 ± 17.05 and t-test analysis showed a significant p value <0.005. A strong correlation (r = 0.7490; p<0.001) was found with glucose measurement with both these techniques. Conclusion: Results of glucometer for measurement of glucose are highly sensitive and specific. Glucometers can be considered as a screening tool for large scale surveys.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14016403
Primary Topic
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Results of Glucometer and Laboratory Technique for Glucose Measurement Among Children

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
article

Comparison of Results of Glucometer and Laboratory Technique for Glucose Measurement Among Children

article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare results of glucometer and laboratory technique for glucose measurement among children. Study design: Cross sectional study Duration and place of study: 6 months from July 2021 to January 2022, department of child health KTH Peshawar. Methodology: 112 children presenting in outpatient department (OPD) for screening were enrolled in the study after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Blood samples were drawn for measurement of blood glucose both by glucometer and laboratory. The values measured were analysed and diagnostic accuracy was calculated along with correlation between these two techniques. Results: Out of 112 patients, 47 (42%) were females and 65 (58%) were males. The frequency of diabetes at screening clinic of our settings came out to be 15.2% (17 patients). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of glucometer was 84%, 94% and 82% respectively. The mean fasting blood sugar measured with glucometer was 115.37 ± 21.10 and that of laboratory measured was 97.85 ± 25.55. The mean difference of blood glucose measured with both the methods was 17.5 ± 17.05 and t-test analysis showed a significant p value <0.005. A strong correlation (r = 0.7490; p<0.001) was found with glucose measurement with both these techniques. Conclusion: Results of glucometer for measurement of glucose are highly sensitive and specific. Glucometers can be considered as a screening tool for large scale surveys.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.