Economic and Financial Impacts of Asset Forfeiture Laws in Indonesia

ABSTRACT: Asset forfeiture laws are critical tools in combating economic crimes, safeguarding public finances, and strengthening institutional integrity. This paper examines the economic and financial implications of Indonesia’s asset forfeiture legislation, with a particular focus on its effectiveness in recovering state losses and deterring illicit activities. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study integrates empirical data analysis with qualitative insights derived from stakeholder interviews, judicial case reviews, and media content analysis. The findings reveal that asset forfeiture has made notable contributions to revenue recovery and crime deterrence. However, its full potential is constrained by enforcement inefficiencies, legal ambiguities, and challenges in institutional coordination. The paper offers policy recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of asset forfeiture laws, improve cross-agency collaboration, and streamline international cooperation, ultimately positioning asset recovery as a cornerstone of Indonesia's anti-corruption and economic development strategies

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14244077
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic and Financial Impacts of Asset Forfeiture Laws in Indonesia

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
article

Economic and Financial Impacts of Asset Forfeiture Laws in Indonesia

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Asset forfeiture laws are critical tools in combating economic crimes, safeguarding public finances, and strengthening institutional integrity. This paper examines the economic and financial implications of Indonesia’s asset forfeiture legislation, with a particular focus on its effectiveness in recovering state losses and deterring illicit activities. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study integrates empirical data analysis with qualitative insights derived from stakeholder interviews, judicial case reviews, and media content analysis. The findings reveal that asset forfeiture has made notable contributions to revenue recovery and crime deterrence. However, its full potential is constrained by enforcement inefficiencies, legal ambiguities, and challenges in institutional coordination. The paper offers policy recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of asset forfeiture laws, improve cross-agency collaboration, and streamline international cooperation, ultimately positioning asset recovery as a cornerstone of Indonesia's anti-corruption and economic development strategies

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Indonesia (ID), Universitas Pendidikan Putra Indonesia Cianjur (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Economic and Financial Impacts of Asset Forfeiture Laws in Indonesia · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS