Performance Comparison between Acknowledgement Schemes in MANET

Since mobile communication services are consistent with the ideal communication style—that is, communication with anyone, anywhere, at any time—the need for communication services is growing quickly. The quantity of links and the dependability of each link that makes up the path determine its availability. The practice of identifying routes across a network with the smallest distance or other cost measure is known as "shortest path routing." An example of a sophisticated, global, multilevel network with millions of routers is the Internet's data packet routing system. The choice of the shortest path routing algorithm is based on directing traffic from the source to the destination, optimizing network performance, and lowering costs. Shortest path routing has the potential to improve network performance, but its effectiveness is partly dependent on the routing protocol's functioning and the settings chosen. Efficient route establishment between two nodes is the main objective of such an ad-hoc network routing protocol in order to ensure timely message delivery. Route construction should be done with a minimum of cost, overhead and bandwidth consumption. In this paper, we compare and analyze the performance of two papers and to justify the best one of their performance of shortest path routing algorithm.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14242111
Primary Topic
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison between Acknowledgement Schemes in MANET

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
article

Performance Comparison between Acknowledgement Schemes in MANET

article en

Abstract

Since mobile communication services are consistent with the ideal communication style—that is, communication with anyone, anywhere, at any time—the need for communication services is growing quickly. The quantity of links and the dependability of each link that makes up the path determine its availability. The practice of identifying routes across a network with the smallest distance or other cost measure is known as "shortest path routing." An example of a sophisticated, global, multilevel network with millions of routers is the Internet's data packet routing system. The choice of the shortest path routing algorithm is based on directing traffic from the source to the destination, optimizing network performance, and lowering costs. Shortest path routing has the potential to improve network performance, but its effectiveness is partly dependent on the routing protocol's functioning and the settings chosen. Efficient route establishment between two nodes is the main objective of such an ad-hoc network routing protocol in order to ensure timely message delivery. Route construction should be done with a minimum of cost, overhead and bandwidth consumption. In this paper, we compare and analyze the performance of two papers and to justify the best one of their performance of shortest path routing algorithm.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.