Artificial intelligence at work in the legal profession

This article investigates the growing application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the context of legal practice. After an introduction of three basic approaches to machine learning: 1) supervised learning and classification techniques, 2), unsupervised learning and pattern recognition and 3) reinforcement learning and automated text generation, the article analyses the potential growing use of this technology by legal professionals in various contexts. The article identifies the many different potential uses of AI and discusses these in the context of the classic tripartite scheme used in much legal reasoning: determination of facts, determination of the law, subsumption of fact under the law. The article concludes with a broader reflection on the limitations of AI's ability to penetrate legal intelligence, and the need for a better understanding of how to harness the technology while harvesting its benefits.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14729744
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence at work in the legal profession

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Artificial intelligence at work in the legal profession

article en

Abstract

This article investigates the growing application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the context of legal practice. After an introduction of three basic approaches to machine learning: 1) supervised learning and classification techniques, 2), unsupervised learning and pattern recognition and 3) reinforcement learning and automated text generation, the article analyses the potential growing use of this technology by legal professionals in various contexts. The article identifies the many different potential uses of AI and discusses these in the context of the classic tripartite scheme used in much legal reasoning: determination of facts, determination of the law, subsumption of fact under the law. The article concludes with a broader reflection on the limitations of AI's ability to penetrate legal intelligence, and the need for a better understanding of how to harness the technology while harvesting its benefits.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Universitas Ekasakti (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.