Differentiation between logistic regression analysis and discriminant analysis methods to reveal the factors which contribute to classify the difficulties of scientific researches that facing faculty members

This study aims to determine the optimal method differentiating between discriminant analysis and binary logistic regression for classifying the challenges faced by faculty members at the University of Ajdabiya in conducting scientific research. Faculty members were categorized into two groups: those who face difficulties and those who do not. The study also seeks to identify the most influential factors contributing to these research challenges. A simple random sampling method was employed, with data collected through a structured questionnaire. The findings revealed that the classification accuracy of the discriminant analysis method was 85.5%, while the logistic regression method achieved a higher classification accuracy of 92.3%. Consequently, logistic regression proved to be more effective than discriminant analysis in data classification. However, both methods yielded consistent results in assessing the impact of independent variables on research challenges. The analysis identified several statistically significant variables—marital status, years of experience, subjective difficulties, and academic challenges-that influence the difficulties encountered by faculty members at the University of Ajdabiya.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15502133
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiation between logistic regression analysis and discriminant analysis methods to reveal the factors which contribute to classify the difficulties of scientific researches that facing faculty members

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Differentiation between logistic regression analysis and discriminant analysis methods to reveal the factors which contribute to classify the difficulties of scientific researches that facing faculty members

article en

Abstract

This study aims to determine the optimal method differentiating between discriminant analysis and binary logistic regression for classifying the challenges faced by faculty members at the University of Ajdabiya in conducting scientific research. Faculty members were categorized into two groups: those who face difficulties and those who do not. The study also seeks to identify the most influential factors contributing to these research challenges. A simple random sampling method was employed, with data collected through a structured questionnaire. The findings revealed that the classification accuracy of the discriminant analysis method was 85.5%, while the logistic regression method achieved a higher classification accuracy of 92.3%. Consequently, logistic regression proved to be more effective than discriminant analysis in data classification. However, both methods yielded consistent results in assessing the impact of independent variables on research challenges. The analysis identified several statistically significant variables—marital status, years of experience, subjective difficulties, and academic challenges-that influence the difficulties encountered by faculty members at the University of Ajdabiya.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Kaya University (KR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.