Conventional Versus Two Ports Plus One Puncture Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Clinical Trial

Background: The gold standard treatment for calculus cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC), three instruments are most useful in ensuring the critical view of safety. The two ports plus one puncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TPPOP LC) assisted needle grasper approach upholds the laparoscopic triangulation principles and allows an accessible critical view of safety. This technique successfully reduces port numbers while maintaining equivalent surgical outcomes. Method: The main objective is to compare clinical outcomes of conventional and two ports plus one puncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This is a single-center hospital based interventional double-blinded randomized controlled trial that included 98 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at No. (1) Military Hospital (700 bedded) from 01/12/2019 to 31/07/2021. The patients were randomized into group A (CLC) (n = 49) and group B (TPPOP LC) (n = 49). This trial was registered in the ISRCTN registry with the registration number ISRCTN50339464. Results: Among total of 98 patients, 46.9% were male patients and 53.1% were female patients. Mean age in group A was 49.86 ± 7.77 years and in group B was 49.33 ± 7.69 years. Mean operation time in group A was 57.9 ± 6.7 minutes and in group B was 58.5 ± 7.1 minutes, with no significant difference (p = 0.66). Although 4.1% of patients in CLC group and 12.2% in TPPOP LC group experienced bile spillage, no other major intraoperative complications were noted. A significant difference was observed at 36 and 48 hours postoperatively (VAS: 2.69 ± 1.16 in group A and 1.94 ± 0.83 in group B at 36 hours; p = 0.005 and VAS: 1.69 ± 0.92 in group A and 1.33 ± 0.63 in group B at 48 hours; p = 0.002). Postoperative minor wound infection was detected 6.1% in group A and 4.1% in group B (p = 0.64). The mean duration of the postoperative hospital stay was 5.24 ± 1.01 days in group A and 4.98 ± 0.92 days in group B (p = 0.17). Conclusion: This clinical trial concludes that two ports plus one puncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective and safe as conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14208575
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conventional Versus Two Ports Plus One Puncture Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Clinical Trial

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

Conventional Versus Two Ports Plus One Puncture Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Clinical Trial

article en

Abstract

Background: The gold standard treatment for calculus cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC), three instruments are most useful in ensuring the critical view of safety. The two ports plus one puncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TPPOP LC) assisted needle grasper approach upholds the laparoscopic triangulation principles and allows an accessible critical view of safety. This technique successfully reduces port numbers while maintaining equivalent surgical outcomes. Method: The main objective is to compare clinical outcomes of conventional and two ports plus one puncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This is a single-center hospital based interventional double-blinded randomized controlled trial that included 98 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at No. (1) Military Hospital (700 bedded) from 01/12/2019 to 31/07/2021. The patients were randomized into group A (CLC) (n = 49) and group B (TPPOP LC) (n = 49). This trial was registered in the ISRCTN registry with the registration number ISRCTN50339464. Results: Among total of 98 patients, 46.9% were male patients and 53.1% were female patients. Mean age in group A was 49.86 ± 7.77 years and in group B was 49.33 ± 7.69 years. Mean operation time in group A was 57.9 ± 6.7 minutes and in group B was 58.5 ± 7.1 minutes, with no significant difference (p = 0.66). Although 4.1% of patients in CLC group and 12.2% in TPPOP LC group experienced bile spillage, no other major intraoperative complications were noted. A significant difference was observed at 36 and 48 hours postoperatively (VAS: 2.69 ± 1.16 in group A and 1.94 ± 0.83 in group B at 36 hours; p = 0.005 and VAS: 1.69 ± 0.92 in group A and 1.33 ± 0.63 in group B at 48 hours; p = 0.002). Postoperative minor wound infection was detected 6.1% in group A and 4.1% in group B (p = 0.64). The mean duration of the postoperative hospital stay was 5.24 ± 1.01 days in group A and 4.98 ± 0.92 days in group B (p = 0.17). Conclusion: This clinical trial concludes that two ports plus one puncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective and safe as conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Myanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit (MM), Livestock Breeding and Veterinary Department (MM)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.