What do we know about implementing ethical principles in the context of Artificial Intelligence? A Systematic Literature Review

Context: In recent times, there has been a notable increase in academic discourse surrounding the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI). This has been driven by the exponential growth in both the usage and development of AI, which is now an integral component of modern technology. However, even with the ongoing research in this area, the issue of AI ethics remains a source of contention, as evidenced by the ongoing debates among researchers. Although ethical issues such as fairness and privacy have been the subject of study, their application in the context of AI development remains uncertain. Goal: The aim of this paper is to identify the current state of ethical AI research in order to gain insight into the challenges encountered in integrating ethics into AI development and the proposed strategies to address these challenges. Methodology: To address this, we conducted an update to the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) published by Cerqueira in 2021. We evaluated research published until April 2023 across three databases to answer three research questions. Results: The collection yielded 1712 studies, of which 38 were determined to be appropriate for analysis. The majority of studies (63%) propose a practical solution to facilitate the implementation of AI ethics. Furthermore, we were able to identify a list containing 26 major ethical principles that have been discussed throughout the literature. Conclusion: The review revealed a considerable diversity in the methods, processes and suggestions proposed, with regard to the type of approach, life cycle phase and objectives. This indicate that, despite the current limitations of AI ethics, the field is developing and addressing a greater number of solutions to mitigate the risks and ethical problems present in AI systems. Keywords: Ethics, AI ethics, Artificial Intelligence, AI ethics principles, Ethical requirements

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13723659
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What do we know about implementing ethical principles in the context of Artificial Intelligence? A Systematic Literature Review

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

What do we know about implementing ethical principles in the context of Artificial Intelligence? A Systematic Literature Review

article en

Abstract

Context: In recent times, there has been a notable increase in academic discourse surrounding the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI). This has been driven by the exponential growth in both the usage and development of AI, which is now an integral component of modern technology. However, even with the ongoing research in this area, the issue of AI ethics remains a source of contention, as evidenced by the ongoing debates among researchers. Although ethical issues such as fairness and privacy have been the subject of study, their application in the context of AI development remains uncertain. Goal: The aim of this paper is to identify the current state of ethical AI research in order to gain insight into the challenges encountered in integrating ethics into AI development and the proposed strategies to address these challenges. Methodology: To address this, we conducted an update to the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) published by Cerqueira in 2021. We evaluated research published until April 2023 across three databases to answer three research questions. Results: The collection yielded 1712 studies, of which 38 were determined to be appropriate for analysis. The majority of studies (63%) propose a practical solution to facilitate the implementation of AI ethics. Furthermore, we were able to identify a list containing 26 major ethical principles that have been discussed throughout the literature. Conclusion: The review revealed a considerable diversity in the methods, processes and suggestions proposed, with regard to the type of approach, life cycle phase and objectives. This indicate that, despite the current limitations of AI ethics, the field is developing and addressing a greater number of solutions to mitigate the risks and ethical problems present in AI systems. Keywords: Ethics, AI ethics, Artificial Intelligence, AI ethics principles, Ethical requirements

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Aalto University (FI)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What do we know about implementing ethical principles in the context of Artificial Intelligence? A Systematic Literature Review · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS