Trigonidiinae Saussure 1874

Subfamily Trigonidiinae Saussure, 1874 Out of 368 crickets examined, forty-three are trigs (subfamily Trigonidiinae). Thirty of these fit the original description and the type material for Trigonidium (Metioche) maoricum, with a black, shining body, arcuate ovipositor, hind tibiae with three pairs of dorsal spurs, no auditory tympana on the anterior tibiae, and no hindwings. Trigonidium (Metioche) maoricum has no abdominal gland and has a stridulum with 30–40 teeth on the male forewing. While Chopard (1968) placed the species in Metioche, the description of Metioche clearly states that insects have forewings without a stridulum in both males and females (Stål 1877; Otte & Alexander 1983; Rentz & Su 2019). Trigonidium, on the other hand, has a stridulum on the right forewing in males (Rambur 1838; Otte & Alexander 1983; Rentz & Su 2019). As a result, the species Trigonidium (Metioche) maoricum is reassigned here to Trigonidium (Trigonidium) Rambur, 1838. This is in agreement with Otte & Alexander (1983), who moved most Australian species placed by Chopard (1968) in Metioche back to Trigonidium. The remaining thirteen trigs examined in this study don’t fit the original description of Trigonidium (Trigonidium) maoricum, in that they have auditory tympana on both the anterior and posterior sides of the fore tibiae, a stridulum with 30 to 40 teeth in males, and a set of hindwings. These characters fit the genus Trigonidomorpha (Chopard 1925; Otte & Alexander 1983; Rentz & Su 2019) and appear to be most closely related to Trigonidomorpha sjostedti. One male trig from Whitianga, Coromandel (NZAC 03037192) had hindwings when it was collected, but had shed its hindwings five days later. All male New Zealand trigs I examined have the same genitalia and the same stridulum with 30 to 40 teeth, regardless of the presence or absence of hindwings and / or auditory tympana. Mitochondrial DNA analysis at the COI locum supports the hypothesis that the two morphs belong to the same species (Fig. 31) and validates the observations made by Ingrisch (1977). I am therefore giving an amended description and diagnosis for the genus Trigonidium and for the species Trigonidium (Trigonidium) maoricum. I am also synonymising the Australian species Trigonidomorpha sjostedti with Trigonidium australianum (Chopard, 1925). Since Trigonidomorpha sjostedti is the type species for the genus Trigonidomorpha, the latter genus is synonymised with Trigonidium. The species Trigonidomorpha obscuripennis Chopard, 1957 from Réunion Island, used by Chintauan-Marquier et al. (2016) to reinstate the genus Trigonidomorpha, should be reassigned to a new genus based on molecular data and on its macroscopically different tegmina. Mitochondrial DNA analysis at the COI locum fails to separate the Australian species Trigonidum (Trigonidium) australianum from Trigonidium (Trigonidium) maoricum (Fig. 31). The two taxa seem to only differ in a few measurements (Table 7), including the number of teeth in the stridulatory file, which is less than 20 in T. australianum (Otte & Alexander 1983; Table 7 in this paper). Since I have been unable to examine the male genitalia of T. australianum, I am not committing to a synonymy of these two taxa just yet. I do suggest, however, that they are likely to be the same species, and at the most two different subspecies.