Mentorship Methods for Successful Case Competition Teams

ABSTRACT: Students at all academic levels have a rare opportunity to integrate and synthesize what they learn in the classroom into an applied real-world environment by using the case construct in case competitions. Since the majority of these competitions are ungraded, feedback from mentors, instructors, and students on both sides of the figurative desk can be extremely candid without causing awkward situations, making it more constructive, changing the atmosphere in a traditional classroom or the students' grade point average, or having an effect on teaching evaluations. The end product is frequently a rigorously analytical paper or PowerPoint presentation where students can deftly illustrate their understanding of the material, persuasively argue their recommendations, participate in insightful Q&A sessions, and adhere to best practices for teamwork. The purpose of this research is to investigate how undergraduate and graduate academic programs advise and coach case competition teams. The two most important variables that determine a case competition rank are "Effort Invested as a Team" and "Mentor Hours." KEYWORDS: case competitions, mentorship methods, teamwork, coaching strategies

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14514283
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mentorship Methods for Successful Case Competition Teams

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovative Teaching Methods
article

Mentorship Methods for Successful Case Competition Teams

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Students at all academic levels have a rare opportunity to integrate and synthesize what they learn in the classroom into an applied real-world environment by using the case construct in case competitions. Since the majority of these competitions are ungraded, feedback from mentors, instructors, and students on both sides of the figurative desk can be extremely candid without causing awkward situations, making it more constructive, changing the atmosphere in a traditional classroom or the students' grade point average, or having an effect on teaching evaluations. The end product is frequently a rigorously analytical paper or PowerPoint presentation where students can deftly illustrate their understanding of the material, persuasively argue their recommendations, participate in insightful Q&A sessions, and adhere to best practices for teamwork. The purpose of this research is to investigate how undergraduate and graduate academic programs advise and coach case competition teams. The two most important variables that determine a case competition rank are "Effort Invested as a Team" and "Mentor Hours." KEYWORDS: case competitions, mentorship methods, teamwork, coaching strategies

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Innovative Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mentorship Methods for Successful Case Competition Teams · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS