Comparative Analysis of MRI and CT Imaging in Diagnosing Liver Lesions in Adults

Background: Liver lesions are often found incidentally, and accurate imaging isdecisive for determining their nature and guiding treatment. This read aims to comparethe characteristic truths of attractive ringing imagery (MRI) and calculated imaging(CT) in inch-big patients presenting with liver lesions, focusing on differentiating kindsfrom malevolent lesions.Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 120 adultpatients (60 males and 60 females) with a mean age of 45 years (range: 25-75 years).Apiece diligent underwent both magnetic resonance imaging and cat imagery. Thediagnostic precision sensitivity specificity positive foretelling value (PPV) and negativeforetelling value (NPV) of both imaging modalities were calculated andcompared.Results: MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 84%-97%).specificity of 88% (95% CI: 79%-93%), PPV of 90% (95% CI: 82%-95%), and NPVof 91% (95% CI: 83%-96%). Cat imagery showed amp sensibility of 85% (95% CI:77%-92%). specificity of 80% (95% CI: 71%-88%), ppv of 86% (95% CI: 78%-92%),and npv of 79% (95% CI: 70%-87%). The overall diagnostic The precision of MRI was90% compared to CT's 82%. Magnetic resonance imaging is incontestable, andimportantly, higher sensibility (p<0.05) compared to cat with nobelium is importantDisagreement inch specificity (p>0.05).Conclusion: MRI provides superior diagnosticaccuracy and sensitivity for characterizing liver lesions in adults, making it a preferredimaging modality. However, CT remains a valuable tool for initial assessment due toits broader availability and faster imaging time.