Supplementary files

Supplementary figure S1. Heatmap showing the different protein expression patterns between groups [breast cancer survivors (n=8); controls (n=10)] at different time points [baseline and post-intervention). Blue color indicates higher and yellow lower protein concentration (z-values). Columns represent each sample in the specific group and the time point, while rows indicate protein names. Supplementary table S1. Between-group baseline comparison in protein levels (NPX) and functional outcomes values between breast cancer survivors (n=10 for protein levels; n=11 for functional outcomes) and controls (n=10). Supplementary table S2. Baseline and post-intervention values in protein levels (NPX) by two groups [breast cancer survivors (n = 8); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S3. Baseline and post - intervention values in protein levels (NPX) by three groups [BCRL diagnosis (n = 4); BCRL risk (n = 4); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S4. Baseline Pearson correlation analysis between protein levels (NPX) and BMI, squat and unilateral chest press values [breast cancer survivors (n = 10); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S5. Baseline Pearson correlation analysis between protein levels and handgrip strength, physical activity levels and cardiorespiratory fitness values [breast cancer survivors (n = 10); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S6. Pearson correlation analysis between changes (Δ) in protein levels and changes (Δ) in BMI, squat, unilateral chest press and handgrip strength values [breast cancer survivors (n = 8); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S7. Pearson correlation analysis between baseline values and changes (Δ) in squat, unilateral chest press and handgrip strength [breast cancer survivors (n = 11); controls (n = 10)] and between baseline values and changes (Δ) in protein levels NPX [breast cancer survivors (n = 8); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S8. Function of proteins that showed significant group-by-time interaction and of proteins that showed higher levels in breast cancer survivors at baseline.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14990229
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supplementary files

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Supplementary files

article en

Abstract

Supplementary figure S1. Heatmap showing the different protein expression patterns between groups [breast cancer survivors (n=8); controls (n=10)] at different time points [baseline and post-intervention). Blue color indicates higher and yellow lower protein concentration (z-values). Columns represent each sample in the specific group and the time point, while rows indicate protein names. Supplementary table S1. Between-group baseline comparison in protein levels (NPX) and functional outcomes values between breast cancer survivors (n=10 for protein levels; n=11 for functional outcomes) and controls (n=10). Supplementary table S2. Baseline and post-intervention values in protein levels (NPX) by two groups [breast cancer survivors (n = 8); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S3. Baseline and post - intervention values in protein levels (NPX) by three groups [BCRL diagnosis (n = 4); BCRL risk (n = 4); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S4. Baseline Pearson correlation analysis between protein levels (NPX) and BMI, squat and unilateral chest press values [breast cancer survivors (n = 10); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S5. Baseline Pearson correlation analysis between protein levels and handgrip strength, physical activity levels and cardiorespiratory fitness values [breast cancer survivors (n = 10); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S6. Pearson correlation analysis between changes (Δ) in protein levels and changes (Δ) in BMI, squat, unilateral chest press and handgrip strength values [breast cancer survivors (n = 8); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S7. Pearson correlation analysis between baseline values and changes (Δ) in squat, unilateral chest press and handgrip strength [breast cancer survivors (n = 11); controls (n = 10)] and between baseline values and changes (Δ) in protein levels NPX [breast cancer survivors (n = 8); controls (n = 10)]. Supplementary table S8. Function of proteins that showed significant group-by-time interaction and of proteins that showed higher levels in breast cancer survivors at baseline.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Europea Miguel de Cervantes (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Supplementary files · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS