Aerothermoelastic effects on a clamped-free-clamped-free panel experiment

Abstract: The experimental design of hypersonic wind tunnel experiments is dictated by the flow properties and duration of the target facility. Short-duration facilities do not afford the opportunity of aerothermal heating, and consequently, this absent heating needs to be emulated or induced. This heat may be induced via a heater to bring the model to a target temperature prior to the experimental run, or it may be emulated by using a different, typically softer, material without heating to replicate the mechanical turn-down that would be present with heat. This lack of heating leads to a different aerodynamic state, even if the structure is near equivalent. For compliant structures, this may be a problem, particularly if there is an aerodynamic-source instability. In this paper, a clamped-free-clamped-free model is assessed using the flow properties of the University of Southern Queensland's facility. Four cases were assessed as combinations of either a 300 K or 623.15 K fluid-side boundary condition, or a 300 K or 623.15 K structural-side material stiffness condition. From the results of coupled, aerothermoelastic simulations there were differences between all cases being assessed, particularly with the hotter material temperature cases exhibiting larger deflections. Despite causing greater aerodynamic forces, the hot wall reduced oscillation amplitude. Consequently, the greatest amplitudes of oscillation were observed for the hot material, cold wall. In a modal sense, the wall temperature had minimal effect on mode participation with a slight increase in higher-order mode contribution. Ultimately, the material temperature was the determining factor for deflection and so heating is value-add, but not a necessity. Keywords: Hypersonics, Aerothermoelasticity, Panels, CFD, Experimental aerodynamics, Experimental design

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14213563
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerothermoelastic effects on a clamped-free-clamped-free panel experiment

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
article

Aerothermoelastic effects on a clamped-free-clamped-free panel experiment

article en

Abstract

Abstract: The experimental design of hypersonic wind tunnel experiments is dictated by the flow properties and duration of the target facility. Short-duration facilities do not afford the opportunity of aerothermal heating, and consequently, this absent heating needs to be emulated or induced. This heat may be induced via a heater to bring the model to a target temperature prior to the experimental run, or it may be emulated by using a different, typically softer, material without heating to replicate the mechanical turn-down that would be present with heat. This lack of heating leads to a different aerodynamic state, even if the structure is near equivalent. For compliant structures, this may be a problem, particularly if there is an aerodynamic-source instability. In this paper, a clamped-free-clamped-free model is assessed using the flow properties of the University of Southern Queensland's facility. Four cases were assessed as combinations of either a 300 K or 623.15 K fluid-side boundary condition, or a 300 K or 623.15 K structural-side material stiffness condition. From the results of coupled, aerothermoelastic simulations there were differences between all cases being assessed, particularly with the hotter material temperature cases exhibiting larger deflections. Despite causing greater aerodynamic forces, the hot wall reduced oscillation amplitude. Consequently, the greatest amplitudes of oscillation were observed for the hot material, cold wall. In a modal sense, the wall temperature had minimal effect on mode participation with a slight increase in higher-order mode contribution. Ultimately, the material temperature was the determining factor for deflection and so heating is value-add, but not a necessity. Keywords: Hypersonics, Aerothermoelasticity, Panels, CFD, Experimental aerodynamics, Experimental design

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Canberra
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.