Comparison of Different Agility Tests by Positions in Young Football Players

The aim of this study was to compare the results of the Illinois Agility Test (IAT) and the Zigzag Agility Test (ZAT) in order to evaluate the agility characteristics of young players according to their positions. 80 male amateur football players (Age: 17.82±0.88 years; Height: 175.33±7.23 cm; Weight: 66.46±9.36 kg) who participated in the study were divided into 3 groups according to their positions: Defenders (n= 26; Age: 17.9±0.93; Height: 175.2±5.16 cm; Weight: 66.9±8.45 kg), Midfielders (n= 27; Age: 17.7±0.86 years; Height: 172.8±5.62 cm; Weight: 63.7±8.10 kg) and Forwards (n= 27; Age: 17.8±0.86 years; Height: 177.9±9.39 cm; Weight: 68.7±10.89 kg). Within the scope of the study, Illinois and Zigzag agility tests were applied to all athletes. In order to determine the effect of three different positions (Defenders, Midfielders and Forwards) on agility (Illinois and Zigzag test), one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used. The measurements showed that playing positions had a significant effect on agility performance (F(4,152)=2.99, p<0.021, ηp²=0.73). In the Illinois test, forward players (16.05±0.38 s) performed significantly better compared to other positions (Midfielders= 16.37±0.49 s, Defenders= 16.74±0.75 s); in the Zigzag test, forward players (6.13±0.20 s) performed significantly better compared to other positions (Midfielders= 6.33±0.28 s, Defenders= 6.37±0.35 s). As a result, it was determined that forward players are more agile than midfielders and defenders, and midfielders have more agility characteristics than defenders.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14568776
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Different Agility Tests by Positions in Young Football Players

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison of Different Agility Tests by Positions in Young Football Players

article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the results of the Illinois Agility Test (IAT) and the Zigzag Agility Test (ZAT) in order to evaluate the agility characteristics of young players according to their positions. 80 male amateur football players (Age: 17.82±0.88 years; Height: 175.33±7.23 cm; Weight: 66.46±9.36 kg) who participated in the study were divided into 3 groups according to their positions: Defenders (n= 26; Age: 17.9±0.93; Height: 175.2±5.16 cm; Weight: 66.9±8.45 kg), Midfielders (n= 27; Age: 17.7±0.86 years; Height: 172.8±5.62 cm; Weight: 63.7±8.10 kg) and Forwards (n= 27; Age: 17.8±0.86 years; Height: 177.9±9.39 cm; Weight: 68.7±10.89 kg). Within the scope of the study, Illinois and Zigzag agility tests were applied to all athletes. In order to determine the effect of three different positions (Defenders, Midfielders and Forwards) on agility (Illinois and Zigzag test), one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used. The measurements showed that playing positions had a significant effect on agility performance (F(4,152)=2.99, p<0.021, ηp²=0.73). In the Illinois test, forward players (16.05±0.38 s) performed significantly better compared to other positions (Midfielders= 16.37±0.49 s, Defenders= 16.74±0.75 s); in the Zigzag test, forward players (6.13±0.20 s) performed significantly better compared to other positions (Midfielders= 6.33±0.28 s, Defenders= 6.37±0.35 s). As a result, it was determined that forward players are more agile than midfielders and defenders, and midfielders have more agility characteristics than defenders.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Iğdır Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.