Comparative Evaluation of Coconut Shell and Rice Husk as Capping Material in Rapid Sand Filters

Rapid sand filters are widely used for water treatment, and the capping material plays a crucial role in their efficiency. This study investigates the effectiveness of coconut shell and rice husk as capping materials in rapid sand filters. The experiment was conducted using identical filters capped with either coconut shell or rice husk, and their performance was evaluated based on turbidity removal, flow rate, and head loss. The results showed that coconut shell outperformed rice husk in turbidity removal (95.6% vs 88.2%) and flow rate (12.5% higher). However, rice husk exhibited lower head loss (23.1% lower). The study concludes that coconut shell is a more efficient capping material than rice husk in rapid sand filters, but rice husk can be a viable alternative considering its lower head loss and environmental benefits. The findings of this research can inform the selection of optimal capping materials for rapid sand filters in water treatment applications.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14288071
Primary Topic
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Coconut Shell and Rice Husk as Capping Material in Rapid Sand Filters

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
article

Comparative Evaluation of Coconut Shell and Rice Husk as Capping Material in Rapid Sand Filters

article en

Abstract

Rapid sand filters are widely used for water treatment, and the capping material plays a crucial role in their efficiency. This study investigates the effectiveness of coconut shell and rice husk as capping materials in rapid sand filters. The experiment was conducted using identical filters capped with either coconut shell or rice husk, and their performance was evaluated based on turbidity removal, flow rate, and head loss. The results showed that coconut shell outperformed rice husk in turbidity removal (95.6% vs 88.2%) and flow rate (12.5% higher). However, rice husk exhibited lower head loss (23.1% lower). The study concludes that coconut shell is a more efficient capping material than rice husk in rapid sand filters, but rice husk can be a viable alternative considering its lower head loss and environmental benefits. The findings of this research can inform the selection of optimal capping materials for rapid sand filters in water treatment applications.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.