Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Scan Versus MRI in Detecting Brain Tumors

Background: Early detection of brain tumors is fundamental to improve treatmentoutcomes and patient survival. Although computed tomography is commonly usedbecause it is accessible, magnetic resonance imaging has become more popular becauseof its higher image resolution. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy ofcomputed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting brain tumors.Methods: The study included 120 participants between the ages of 20 to 75 (mean age:48), each of whom had a computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scanfor suspected brain tumors. Diagnostic measures such as true positives (TP), truenegatives (TN), false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were calculated.Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value(NPV) and accuracy for each model. Results: CT scans identified 45 TP, 60 TN, 10 FP,and 5 FN cases. The sensitivity of CT scans was 90.0%, specificity was 85.7%, PPVwas 81.8%, NPV was 92.3%, and accuracy was 87.5%. MRI identified 48 TP, 65 TN, 6FP, and 1 FN case. The sensitivity of MRI was 98.0%, specificity was 91.5%, PPV was88.9%, NPV was 98.5%, and accuracy was 93.8%. MRI demonstrated highersensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy compared to CT scans.Conclusion:Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to computed tomography in detecting braintumors. It has greater overall sensitivity and accuracy. These findings suggest that MRIshould be used to diagnose brain tumors. Especially where high sensitivity isimportant. However, factors such as cost and accessibility should be considered whenchoosing between these methods

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13991350
Primary Topic
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Scan Versus MRI in Detecting Brain Tumors

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Scan Versus MRI in Detecting Brain Tumors

article en

Abstract

Background: Early detection of brain tumors is fundamental to improve treatmentoutcomes and patient survival. Although computed tomography is commonly usedbecause it is accessible, magnetic resonance imaging has become more popular becauseof its higher image resolution. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy ofcomputed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting brain tumors.Methods: The study included 120 participants between the ages of 20 to 75 (mean age:48), each of whom had a computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scanfor suspected brain tumors. Diagnostic measures such as true positives (TP), truenegatives (TN), false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were calculated.Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value(NPV) and accuracy for each model. Results: CT scans identified 45 TP, 60 TN, 10 FP,and 5 FN cases. The sensitivity of CT scans was 90.0%, specificity was 85.7%, PPVwas 81.8%, NPV was 92.3%, and accuracy was 87.5%. MRI identified 48 TP, 65 TN, 6FP, and 1 FN case. The sensitivity of MRI was 98.0%, specificity was 91.5%, PPV was88.9%, NPV was 98.5%, and accuracy was 93.8%. MRI demonstrated highersensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy compared to CT scans.Conclusion:Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to computed tomography in detecting braintumors. It has greater overall sensitivity and accuracy. These findings suggest that MRIshould be used to diagnose brain tumors. Especially where high sensitivity isimportant. However, factors such as cost and accessibility should be considered whenchoosing between these methods

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.