The Byzantine Spirit: In Between the Renaissance and Modernity

This article aims to assess the impact of the peculiar, dualistic “Byzantine spirit” on the rise of the modern world, as a background to contemporary political-theological developments. It will be using the approach and the tools of political anthropology, in particular the terms “liminality”, “trickster”, and “schismogenesis”. The source of such dualistic spirit is the dual nature of the Hippodrome: location of solemn public-religious rituals, on the one hand, and on the other of various circus entertainment, survivals of the pre-Christian Roman Empire; both under the authority of the Emperor, who thus embodied in his person religious and secular authority, deeply confusing charismatic and trickster roles. It was this spirit that was transmitted, in the liminal moment of the sack of Constantinople, into the West, playing a fundamental role in the rise of the modern world, which reproduced the East-West schism with the rise of Protestantism. Focus here will be on the extremely ambiguous nature of the “public sphere”, already central for the hesychasm debate in the 14th century, and which is systematically ignored in the modern celebration of the media and the public.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14364260
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Byzantine Spirit: In Between the Renaissance and Modernity

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Byzantine Studies and History
article

The Byzantine Spirit: In Between the Renaissance and Modernity

article en

Abstract

This article aims to assess the impact of the peculiar, dualistic “Byzantine spirit” on the rise of the modern world, as a background to contemporary political-theological developments. It will be using the approach and the tools of political anthropology, in particular the terms “liminality”, “trickster”, and “schismogenesis”. The source of such dualistic spirit is the dual nature of the Hippodrome: location of solemn public-religious rituals, on the one hand, and on the other of various circus entertainment, survivals of the pre-Christian Roman Empire; both under the authority of the Emperor, who thus embodied in his person religious and secular authority, deeply confusing charismatic and trickster roles. It was this spirit that was transmitted, in the liminal moment of the sack of Constantinople, into the West, playing a fundamental role in the rise of the modern world, which reproduced the East-West schism with the rise of Protestantism. Focus here will be on the extremely ambiguous nature of the “public sphere”, already central for the hesychasm debate in the 14th century, and which is systematically ignored in the modern celebration of the media and the public.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University College Cork (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.