Ghost segments in Sengwer nouns

Like other Kalenjin languages, Sengwer has a complex noun morphology which makes use of an abundance of affixes as well as word-internal tone and ATR changes. In addition, its nominal inflectional paradigms are teeming with unexpected stem-final segments which appear in certain morphological conditions but are absent in others. The phonological composition of this stem-final latent material is not predictable and varies from noun to noun – C, V, CV and even CCV are all possible. In this talk, I will outline a novel analysis of their behaviour and distribution which explains much of the variation and irregularity seen in nominal inflection. In particular, I will show evidence that although some of these latent segments are part of the root, others are part of suffixes and others still are morphologically active suffixes in their own right. In a departure from earlier studies, I argue that these segments can no longer be analysed as being inserted thematic material and are better understood as deleted ghost segments instead.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14171676
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ghost segments in Sengwer nouns

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Ghost segments in Sengwer nouns

article en

Abstract

Like other Kalenjin languages, Sengwer has a complex noun morphology which makes use of an abundance of affixes as well as word-internal tone and ATR changes. In addition, its nominal inflectional paradigms are teeming with unexpected stem-final segments which appear in certain morphological conditions but are absent in others. The phonological composition of this stem-final latent material is not predictable and varies from noun to noun – C, V, CV and even CCV are all possible. In this talk, I will outline a novel analysis of their behaviour and distribution which explains much of the variation and irregularity seen in nominal inflection. In particular, I will show evidence that although some of these latent segments are part of the root, others are part of suffixes and others still are morphologically active suffixes in their own right. In a departure from earlier studies, I argue that these segments can no longer be analysed as being inserted thematic material and are better understood as deleted ghost segments instead.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ghost segments in Sengwer nouns · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS