Tracing the positive obligations of criminal law from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court. Possible tests of a not yet definitive model for an evolving interpretative reconstruction

Abstract: The present work aims to investigate in a comparative manner through the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the statutes of the international criminal courts the criminal sector, as traces of the general part of criminal law. It is a criminal law of reconstructive theoretical model with evolving interpretative perspectives especially of the jurisprudence of the international criminal tribunals which aims to build positive models for criminal protection. It carries out through the relative jurisprudence steps forward by building a maturity in the general part of criminal law. Because of all this, crimes against humanity finally follow a punishable path, outside of political contexts of the past and put domestic law, as we see in the case of Germany, in a position of reflection regarding international crimes but also of harmonization, integration with international law leaving questions such as that of superior responsibility, etc. open, i.e. constantly evolving and reflecting.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13995696
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing the positive obligations of criminal law from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court. Possible tests of a not yet definitive model for an evolving interpretative reconstruction

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Tracing the positive obligations of criminal law from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court. Possible tests of a not yet definitive model for an evolving interpretative reconstruction

article en

Abstract

Abstract: The present work aims to investigate in a comparative manner through the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the statutes of the international criminal courts the criminal sector, as traces of the general part of criminal law. It is a criminal law of reconstructive theoretical model with evolving interpretative perspectives especially of the jurisprudence of the international criminal tribunals which aims to build positive models for criminal protection. It carries out through the relative jurisprudence steps forward by building a maturity in the general part of criminal law. Because of all this, crimes against humanity finally follow a punishable path, outside of political contexts of the past and put domestic law, as we see in the case of Germany, in a position of reflection regarding international crimes but also of harmonization, integration with international law leaving questions such as that of superior responsibility, etc. open, i.e. constantly evolving and reflecting.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.