How Much Do Guidelines in Thoracic Surgery Influence Our Daily Practice? – A Review of the Current Routine

ABSTRACT Guidelines are formulated based on the results of randomised clinical trials, other non-randomized studies, and expert opinions (i.e., the opinions of most guideline committees). A randomised, multicenter, controlled trial is the ideal study to determine a patient population's mean values. However, some diseases and populations do not lend themselves easily to this format, and therefore, studies with less stringent design and enrollment criteria are often used. The latest guidelines have more reliable data and distinct subgroups and carry a higher risk of misinterpreting results than older models. Guidelines are part of a continuous educational program to facilitate a more homogeneous approach to all patients with the same disease, reduce inappropriate and unnecessary testing, ineffective treatments, and health costs, and ultimately improve care. As a result, guidelines are allegiant. The surgeon should question why and how this guideline was prepared, who supported its creation, who is on its organisation committee, and what it represents. Within the scope of this review, recommendations to improve the guidelines will be presented. Keyswords: Thoracic Surgery, Guidelines, Randomised Controlled Trials, Clinical Practice.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13784406
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Much Do Guidelines in Thoracic Surgery Influence Our Daily Practice? – A Review of the Current Routine

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

How Much Do Guidelines in Thoracic Surgery Influence Our Daily Practice? – A Review of the Current Routine

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Guidelines are formulated based on the results of randomised clinical trials, other non-randomized studies, and expert opinions (i.e., the opinions of most guideline committees). A randomised, multicenter, controlled trial is the ideal study to determine a patient population's mean values. However, some diseases and populations do not lend themselves easily to this format, and therefore, studies with less stringent design and enrollment criteria are often used. The latest guidelines have more reliable data and distinct subgroups and carry a higher risk of misinterpreting results than older models. Guidelines are part of a continuous educational program to facilitate a more homogeneous approach to all patients with the same disease, reduce inappropriate and unnecessary testing, ineffective treatments, and health costs, and ultimately improve care. As a result, guidelines are allegiant. The surgeon should question why and how this guideline was prepared, who supported its creation, who is on its organisation committee, and what it represents. Within the scope of this review, recommendations to improve the guidelines will be presented. Keyswords: Thoracic Surgery, Guidelines, Randomised Controlled Trials, Clinical Practice.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Much Do Guidelines in Thoracic Surgery Influence Our Daily Practice? – A Review of the Current Routine · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS