OPTIMIZING INVESTMENT APPROACHES USING SHORT INTEREST RATIOS DURING ECONOMIC CONSTRAINTS

The ongoing debate regarding the rationality of stock markets is framed within two predominant theoretical perspectives: classical and behavioral finance. The classical view posits that stock markets are efficient, with stock prices accurately reflecting changes in expected future cash flows or discount rates, implying no direct relationship between share prices and corporate investment decisions. In this view, stock prices should align with a company's fundamentals, and investment decisions should not be influenced by market conditions. Conversely, the behavioral finance perspective suggests that stock prices can deviate from their fundamental values, and managers may strategically time equity issues to capitalize on periods when stock prices are inflated relative to their intrinsic value. This perspective challenges the notion of market efficiency by highlighting instances where managerial decisions are influenced by short-term market conditions rather than long-term fundamentals. This paper explores these competing frameworks, examining the implications of each for understanding stock market behavior and corporate financial strategies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14133849
Primary Topic
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OPTIMIZING INVESTMENT APPROACHES USING SHORT INTEREST RATIOS DURING ECONOMIC CONSTRAINTS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
article

OPTIMIZING INVESTMENT APPROACHES USING SHORT INTEREST RATIOS DURING ECONOMIC CONSTRAINTS

article en

Abstract

The ongoing debate regarding the rationality of stock markets is framed within two predominant theoretical perspectives: classical and behavioral finance. The classical view posits that stock markets are efficient, with stock prices accurately reflecting changes in expected future cash flows or discount rates, implying no direct relationship between share prices and corporate investment decisions. In this view, stock prices should align with a company's fundamentals, and investment decisions should not be influenced by market conditions. Conversely, the behavioral finance perspective suggests that stock prices can deviate from their fundamental values, and managers may strategically time equity issues to capitalize on periods when stock prices are inflated relative to their intrinsic value. This perspective challenges the notion of market efficiency by highlighting instances where managerial decisions are influenced by short-term market conditions rather than long-term fundamentals. This paper explores these competing frameworks, examining the implications of each for understanding stock market behavior and corporate financial strategies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tulane University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.