THE APPLICATION OF ENEMY CRIMINAL LAW AND SOME CONSEQUENCES IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the possible consequences that may occur in the Brazilian legal system when the application of the criminal law of the enemy is used. The philosopher Günther Jakobs is considered the creator of the Theory of Criminal Law of the Enemy, whose primary objective is to treat criminals within society differently. According to Jakobs, there are 2 (two) types of offenders: common criminals and criminals who are enemies of the State. The first refers to those who commit any type of common crime, unlike the second, in which the crime directly affects the democratic and constitutional order of the State. Therefore, common criminals have the prerogative to use all procedural resources inherent to the process guaranteed to citizens, but the same does not apply to criminals considered enemies of the State, since they have become merely objects deprived of any type of constitutional rights and are no longer considered citizens.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14025330
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE APPLICATION OF ENEMY CRIMINAL LAW AND SOME CONSEQUENCES IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

THE APPLICATION OF ENEMY CRIMINAL LAW AND SOME CONSEQUENCES IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM

article en

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the possible consequences that may occur in the Brazilian legal system when the application of the criminal law of the enemy is used. The philosopher Günther Jakobs is considered the creator of the Theory of Criminal Law of the Enemy, whose primary objective is to treat criminals within society differently. According to Jakobs, there are 2 (two) types of offenders: common criminals and criminals who are enemies of the State. The first refers to those who commit any type of common crime, unlike the second, in which the crime directly affects the democratic and constitutional order of the State. Therefore, common criminals have the prerogative to use all procedural resources inherent to the process guaranteed to citizens, but the same does not apply to criminals considered enemies of the State, since they have become merely objects deprived of any type of constitutional rights and are no longer considered citizens.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad de la Integración de las Américas (PY)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.