Communication Infrastructure (Disaster) Resilience

This presentation, titled "Communication Infrastructure (Disaster) Resilience," discusses the challenges and solutions for maintaining communication infrastructure in the wake of disasters, using the recent Kahramanmaraş earthquake in Turkey as a case study. The presentation examines various communication technologies, such as cellular networks, satellite networks, and wireless ad hoc networks, exploring their strengths and weaknesses in disaster scenarios. It also highlights the critical role of energy supply, network redundancy, and quality of service (QoS) in ensuring resilient communication infrastructure. The presentation concludes with recommendations for improving communication infrastructure resilience, emphasizing the importance of robust disaster action plans, collaborative efforts between operators, and innovative use of technologies like LoRa and mesh networks.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13873658
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication Infrastructure (Disaster) Resilience

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Communication Infrastructure (Disaster) Resilience

article en

Abstract

This presentation, titled "Communication Infrastructure (Disaster) Resilience," discusses the challenges and solutions for maintaining communication infrastructure in the wake of disasters, using the recent Kahramanmaraş earthquake in Turkey as a case study. The presentation examines various communication technologies, such as cellular networks, satellite networks, and wireless ad hoc networks, exploring their strengths and weaknesses in disaster scenarios. It also highlights the critical role of energy supply, network redundancy, and quality of service (QoS) in ensuring resilient communication infrastructure. The presentation concludes with recommendations for improving communication infrastructure resilience, emphasizing the importance of robust disaster action plans, collaborative efforts between operators, and innovative use of technologies like LoRa and mesh networks.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Muğla University (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.