Sinodrepanus falsus

Sinodrepanus falsus (Sharp, 1875) Oniticellus falsus Sharp, 1875: 52 (original description) Drepanochirus falsus: Boucomont & Gillet, 1921: 19 Cyptochirus falsus: Boucomont & Gillet, 1927: 103; Paulian, 1945: 128 Drepanocerus falsus: Janssens, 1953: 36, 37; Balthasar, 1963: 62, 66; Biswas & Chatterjee, 1985: 151 (probably to be ascribed to S. schoenfeldi new species); Sewak, 2003: 253, 283 (to be ascribed to S. schoenfeldi new species?); Sewak, 2006: 219 Sinodrepanus falsus: Simonis, 1985: 98, 103, 104; Kabakov & Napolov, 1999: 73; Ochi et al., 2004: 355; Bezděk & Krell, 2006: 157; Krikken, 2009: 9, 14, 21; Kabakov & Shokhin, 2014: 58; Mittal & Jain, 2015: 393; Bezděk, 2016: 174; Montanaro, 2021: 585 Type locality: Laos. Type material examined. Holotype, ♀ (MNHN): Laos / Mouhot [wc, line 1 hb, line 2 pb] // Oniticellus / falsus / Type D.S. [wc, hb except “Type” pb] // Ex Musaeo / D. Sharp 1890 [wc, pb] // MUSÉUM PARIS / 1952 / COLL. R. OBERTHÜR [wc, pb] // A. Janssens det. 1953 / Drepanocerus / falsus Sharp ♀ / Type [wc, hb except “A. Janssens det. 195” pb] // TYPE [rc, pb] // HOLOTYPE [rc, pb] // HOLOTYPE / Sinodrepanus / falsus (Sharp) [wc, pb] // MNHN / EC8103 [wc, pb]. Additional material examined (37♂♂, 20♀♀). China: S Yunnan province, Xishuangbanna, Guangpin environment, 0km [sic!] N Jinghong, 1000m, 19–27.i.2003, S. Murzin legit [1♂, PMOC]; S Yunnan province, Jinghong, 9–14.vii.1990, R. Červenka legit [2♂♂, NMPC]. Laos: Xayaboury province, Hongsa environment, 19°40–44’N 101°20’E, 550–750m, 2–3.vii.2010, D. Hauck legit [1♀, JSCS]; Paklay, viii.1917, R.V. de Salvaza legit [1♂, BMNH]; Louangphrabang, Thong Khan, 19°35’N 101°58’E, ~ 750m, 11–21.v.2002, Vit Kubáň legit [10♂♂ & 6♀♀, NMPC]; Phongsaly province, Ban Sano Mai environment, 21°21’N 102°03’E, ~ 1150m, 19–26.v.2004, Vit Kubáň legit [2♂♂, NMPC]; Xayaboury province, Pak Lay env., 18°13’N 101°22–24’E, 12–13.vii.2010, David Hauck legit [4♂♂, 2♀♀, NMBS; 2♂♂, 1♀, JSCS]. Thailand: Ban Tao Phan, 11.iii.1918 [likely Ban Phan Tao in Chiang Mai province; 1♂, BMNH]; Chiang Mai province, Chiang Dao, Chiang Dao Hill Resort environment, 19°33’28.37”N 99°4’34.20”E, 2–11.vii.2019, Vishnyakov Alexey legit [1♂, GMOC]; Chiang Mai province, Chiang Dao, 19°33’28”N 99°4’34”E, 14.vi.2017, Prosvirov legit [1♀, GMOC]; Chiang Mai province, Chiangdao Hill Resort, 19°33’29.19”N 99°04’33.34”E, 1-15.vii.2019, Ustinov V. legit [2♂♂, GMOC]; 100km N Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao hill Resort, 20-30.VI.2008, S. Murzin legit [1♂, PMOC]; Loei province, Na Haeo biological station, cow dung, 5–12.v.2001, Constant & Grootaert legit [4♂♂, 6♀♀, RBINS]; Loei province, Na Haeo, zebu dung, 18.v.2003, J. Constant & K. Smets legit [2♂♂, 2♀♀, RBINS]; Umphang river, 16°07’N 99°00’E, 1000m, 28.iv– 6.v.1991, Vit Kubáň legit [4♂♂, 1♀, NMPC]. Diagnosis. Sinodrepanus falsus can be distinguished from other species by the characters provided by Montanaro (2021). Additionally, this species is rather distinctive for having a particularly uneven body surface, with strong pronotal carinas that delimit well-marked spaces on the pronotum, recalling those of the genus Cyptochirus Lesne, 1900 —see also Simonis (1985) and Simonis & Zunino (1980). See also the dichotomous key provided below. Description: see Montanaro (2021). Variation. Body size ranges from 7.2 to 9.8 mm. No other significant variation was observed. Verified distribution. China (Yunnan), Laos, Thailand (Fig. 4). Kabakov & Napolov (1999) recorded S. falsus from Vietnam, considering S. exsul as a synonym of it. Kabakov & Shokhin (2014) recorded S. falsus from China (Sichuan). These records should be reassessed to understand the true identity of such species. See also the “ Indian Sinodrepanus: an overlooked diversity?” section for more distributional comments. Ecology. Some specimens were collected in cow and zebu dung. Etymology. Latin adjective meaning “deceived”, “tricked”; by extension “false”, “untrue”. It is probably referred to the cryptic appearance of this species, shared with all other Sinodrepanus, that camouflages these beetles within dung and other fibrous substrates.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14261551
Primary Topic
Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sinodrepanus falsus

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
article

Sinodrepanus falsus

article en

Abstract

Sinodrepanus falsus (Sharp, 1875) Oniticellus falsus Sharp, 1875: 52 (original description) Drepanochirus falsus: Boucomont & Gillet, 1921: 19 Cyptochirus falsus: Boucomont & Gillet, 1927: 103; Paulian, 1945: 128 Drepanocerus falsus: Janssens, 1953: 36, 37; Balthasar, 1963: 62, 66; Biswas & Chatterjee, 1985: 151 (probably to be ascribed to S. schoenfeldi new species); Sewak, 2003: 253, 283 (to be ascribed to S. schoenfeldi new species?); Sewak, 2006: 219 Sinodrepanus falsus: Simonis, 1985: 98, 103, 104; Kabakov & Napolov, 1999: 73; Ochi et al., 2004: 355; Bezděk & Krell, 2006: 157; Krikken, 2009: 9, 14, 21; Kabakov & Shokhin, 2014: 58; Mittal & Jain, 2015: 393; Bezděk, 2016: 174; Montanaro, 2021: 585 Type locality: Laos. Type material examined. Holotype, ♀ (MNHN): Laos / Mouhot [wc, line 1 hb, line 2 pb] // Oniticellus / falsus / Type D.S. [wc, hb except “Type” pb] // Ex Musaeo / D. Sharp 1890 [wc, pb] // MUSÉUM PARIS / 1952 / COLL. R. OBERTHÜR [wc, pb] // A. Janssens det. 1953 / Drepanocerus / falsus Sharp ♀ / Type [wc, hb except “A. Janssens det. 195” pb] // TYPE [rc, pb] // HOLOTYPE [rc, pb] // HOLOTYPE / Sinodrepanus / falsus (Sharp) [wc, pb] // MNHN / EC8103 [wc, pb]. Additional material examined (37♂♂, 20♀♀). China: S Yunnan province, Xishuangbanna, Guangpin environment, 0km [sic!] N Jinghong, 1000m, 19–27.i.2003, S. Murzin legit [1♂, PMOC]; S Yunnan province, Jinghong, 9–14.vii.1990, R. Červenka legit [2♂♂, NMPC]. Laos: Xayaboury province, Hongsa environment, 19°40–44’N 101°20’E, 550–750m, 2–3.vii.2010, D. Hauck legit [1♀, JSCS]; Paklay, viii.1917, R.V. de Salvaza legit [1♂, BMNH]; Louangphrabang, Thong Khan, 19°35’N 101°58’E, ~ 750m, 11–21.v.2002, Vit Kubáň legit [10♂♂ & 6♀♀, NMPC]; Phongsaly province, Ban Sano Mai environment, 21°21’N 102°03’E, ~ 1150m, 19–26.v.2004, Vit Kubáň legit [2♂♂, NMPC]; Xayaboury province, Pak Lay env., 18°13’N 101°22–24’E, 12–13.vii.2010, David Hauck legit [4♂♂, 2♀♀, NMBS; 2♂♂, 1♀, JSCS]. Thailand: Ban Tao Phan, 11.iii.1918 [likely Ban Phan Tao in Chiang Mai province; 1♂, BMNH]; Chiang Mai province, Chiang Dao, Chiang Dao Hill Resort environment, 19°33’28.37”N 99°4’34.20”E, 2–11.vii.2019, Vishnyakov Alexey legit [1♂, GMOC]; Chiang Mai province, Chiang Dao, 19°33’28”N 99°4’34”E, 14.vi.2017, Prosvirov legit [1♀, GMOC]; Chiang Mai province, Chiangdao Hill Resort, 19°33’29.19”N 99°04’33.34”E, 1-15.vii.2019, Ustinov V. legit [2♂♂, GMOC]; 100km N Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao hill Resort, 20-30.VI.2008, S. Murzin legit [1♂, PMOC]; Loei province, Na Haeo biological station, cow dung, 5–12.v.2001, Constant & Grootaert legit [4♂♂, 6♀♀, RBINS]; Loei province, Na Haeo, zebu dung, 18.v.2003, J. Constant & K. Smets legit [2♂♂, 2♀♀, RBINS]; Umphang river, 16°07’N 99°00’E, 1000m, 28.iv– 6.v.1991, Vit Kubáň legit [4♂♂, 1♀, NMPC]. Diagnosis. Sinodrepanus falsus can be distinguished from other species by the characters provided by Montanaro (2021). Additionally, this species is rather distinctive for having a particularly uneven body surface, with strong pronotal carinas that delimit well-marked spaces on the pronotum, recalling those of the genus Cyptochirus Lesne, 1900 —see also Simonis (1985) and Simonis & Zunino (1980). See also the dichotomous key provided below. Description: see Montanaro (2021). Variation. Body size ranges from 7.2 to 9.8 mm. No other significant variation was observed. Verified distribution. China (Yunnan), Laos, Thailand (Fig. 4). Kabakov & Napolov (1999) recorded S. falsus from Vietnam, considering S. exsul as a synonym of it. Kabakov & Shokhin (2014) recorded S. falsus from China (Sichuan). These records should be reassessed to understand the true identity of such species. See also the “ Indian Sinodrepanus: an overlooked diversity?” section for more distributional comments. Ecology. Some specimens were collected in cow and zebu dung. Etymology. Latin adjective meaning “deceived”, “tricked”; by extension “false”, “untrue”. It is probably referred to the cryptic appearance of this species, shared with all other Sinodrepanus, that camouflages these beetles within dung and other fibrous substrates.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.