Comparative study of safety and efficacy of cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid injection versus intralesional injection of corticosteroid plus 5- flurouracil in the treatment of keloid

Background: Keloid is an overgrowth of dense, fibrous tissue, usually developing after healing of a skin injury and extends beyond the borders of the original wound. The treatment of keloid has been a challenge, and at times, frustrating because of the recurrence. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid injection versus intralesional injection of corticosteroid plus 5- flurouracil in the treatment of keloid. Materials and methods: The Department of Dermatology & Venereology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka conducted a cross-sectional comparative study on 70 outpatients with clinically diagnosed keloids. SPSS 23 was used to analyses data. The significance threshold of p < 0.05 was analyzed using the chi-square test and student “t” test. Mean standard deviation was used for continuous scale data and number percentage for categorical data. Results: TAverage age was found 33.5±9.3 years in group A, 31.7±10.3 in group B. Scar height was 3.47±0.99 mm in group A and 3.59±0.61 mm in group B. At the first follow-up, scar height was significantly larger in group A (2.54±0.87 vs 2.12±0.54 mm) than group B. At 2nd follow-up, scar height was considerably greater in group A (1.85±1.01 vs 1.10±0.43 mm) than group B Group A had 17 (48.6%) efficacy and group B 26 (74.3The end outcome was good to excellent for 16 (45.7%) in group A and 25 (71.4%) in group B. The two groups showed a significant difference (p<0.05). Side effects included 6 (17.1%) skin atrophy in group A but none in B. Telangiectasia was 8(22.9%) in group A and 1(2.9%) in B. Hypopigmentation was 7(20.0%) in group A and absent in B. Ulceration was 47 (11.4%) in group B but not in A. Group A had 14 (40.0%) recurrence and group B 6 (17.1%). The two groups showed a significant difference (p<0.05). Conclusion: Cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid with 5-fluorouracil treating keloids is more effective, lasts less, and has less side effects than Cryotherapy alone. Cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid plus 5-fluorouracil reduces scar height considerably.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13208767
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of safety and efficacy of cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid injection versus intralesional injection of corticosteroid plus 5- flurouracil in the treatment of keloid

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Comparative study of safety and efficacy of cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid injection versus intralesional injection of corticosteroid plus 5- flurouracil in the treatment of keloid

article en

Abstract

Background: Keloid is an overgrowth of dense, fibrous tissue, usually developing after healing of a skin injury and extends beyond the borders of the original wound. The treatment of keloid has been a challenge, and at times, frustrating because of the recurrence. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid injection versus intralesional injection of corticosteroid plus 5- flurouracil in the treatment of keloid. Materials and methods: The Department of Dermatology & Venereology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka conducted a cross-sectional comparative study on 70 outpatients with clinically diagnosed keloids. SPSS 23 was used to analyses data. The significance threshold of p < 0.05 was analyzed using the chi-square test and student “t” test. Mean standard deviation was used for continuous scale data and number percentage for categorical data. Results: TAverage age was found 33.5±9.3 years in group A, 31.7±10.3 in group B. Scar height was 3.47±0.99 mm in group A and 3.59±0.61 mm in group B. At the first follow-up, scar height was significantly larger in group A (2.54±0.87 vs 2.12±0.54 mm) than group B. At 2nd follow-up, scar height was considerably greater in group A (1.85±1.01 vs 1.10±0.43 mm) than group B Group A had 17 (48.6%) efficacy and group B 26 (74.3The end outcome was good to excellent for 16 (45.7%) in group A and 25 (71.4%) in group B. The two groups showed a significant difference (p<0.05). Side effects included 6 (17.1%) skin atrophy in group A but none in B. Telangiectasia was 8(22.9%) in group A and 1(2.9%) in B. Hypopigmentation was 7(20.0%) in group A and absent in B. Ulceration was 47 (11.4%) in group B but not in A. Group A had 14 (40.0%) recurrence and group B 6 (17.1%). The two groups showed a significant difference (p<0.05). Conclusion: Cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid with 5-fluorouracil treating keloids is more effective, lasts less, and has less side effects than Cryotherapy alone. Cryotherapy followed by intralesional corticosteroid plus 5-fluorouracil reduces scar height considerably.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bangladesh Medical University (BD), Islamic University (BD), Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (BD), Directorate General of Health Services (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.