How fit is the available data on irregular migration for policymaking?

Evidence-based policymaking is often considered a laudable goal – but applied to the field of irregular migration, there arise some principal challenges. Irregular migration is notoriously hard to measure as it occurs outside of regulatory norms and may often go undetected, while robust data and estimates are often non-existent, outdated or incomplete. Nevertheless, data are cited in policymaking in this area, where ‘illegal border crossings’ are used as a substitute, or outdated maximum estimates are used as a ‘low bar’ by future standards. New policies are put forward that aim to fill the gap in information, for example on ‘overstayers’ or ‘secondary movements’. This policy brief gives a 360-degree overview on what we currently know about the extent of irregular migration across the EU. Based on MIrreM’s analysis and aggregation of estimates available for 12 European countries (including the UK) in the period 2016 to 2023, the irregular migrant population can be estimated at between 2.6 and 3.2 million. The previous Clandestino estimate was 1.8 to 3.8 million for the same 12 countries in 2008. This suggests that the number of the irregular migrant population has not substantially changed at the aggregate level for these countries – although there have been important changes in individual countries. In addition, the policy brief also surveys what information is available and still lacking in regard to trends and patterns of irregular movement, including what information we will have on ‘overstayers’, a key proportion of the irregular migrant population identified under the Clandestino project. We also discuss innovative methods that offer promising new ways to estimating the broader irregular migrant population. Throughout, we signpost where policymakers should treat data with care, and understand the limitations of the data they may use.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13757685
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How fit is the available data on irregular migration for policymaking?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

How fit is the available data on irregular migration for policymaking?

article en

Abstract

Evidence-based policymaking is often considered a laudable goal – but applied to the field of irregular migration, there arise some principal challenges. Irregular migration is notoriously hard to measure as it occurs outside of regulatory norms and may often go undetected, while robust data and estimates are often non-existent, outdated or incomplete. Nevertheless, data are cited in policymaking in this area, where ‘illegal border crossings’ are used as a substitute, or outdated maximum estimates are used as a ‘low bar’ by future standards. New policies are put forward that aim to fill the gap in information, for example on ‘overstayers’ or ‘secondary movements’. This policy brief gives a 360-degree overview on what we currently know about the extent of irregular migration across the EU. Based on MIrreM’s analysis and aggregation of estimates available for 12 European countries (including the UK) in the period 2016 to 2023, the irregular migrant population can be estimated at between 2.6 and 3.2 million. The previous Clandestino estimate was 1.8 to 3.8 million for the same 12 countries in 2008. This suggests that the number of the irregular migrant population has not substantially changed at the aggregate level for these countries – although there have been important changes in individual countries. In addition, the policy brief also surveys what information is available and still lacking in regard to trends and patterns of irregular movement, including what information we will have on ‘overstayers’, a key proportion of the irregular migrant population identified under the Clandestino project. We also discuss innovative methods that offer promising new ways to estimating the broader irregular migrant population. Throughout, we signpost where policymakers should treat data with care, and understand the limitations of the data they may use.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Potsdam (DE), Maastricht University (NL), University of Oxford (GB), International Centre for Migration Policy Development (AT), Universitätsklinikum Krems (AT), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How fit is the available data on irregular migration for policymaking? · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS