The impact of geometry on 3D Resistivity/IP surveys

The Geometric Factor (k) can become infinite with a high spatial gradient for certain geometries used in Induced Polarisation (IP) surveys. This can lead to significant errors in computed apparent resistivities. Understanding the behaviour of the Geometric Factor for the different arrays used in mineral exploration is key to avoiding misleading interpretation of geoelectrical data. It is well known that at long offsets, high Geometric Factor values amplify low voltages to generate noisy apparent resistivities. However, at short offsets, equipotentials can represent an important source of noise. Practical solutions, such as varying the spacing between current electrodes or adjusting their positions along specific axes and changing the line spacing can be implemented to mitigate these geometry related issues. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of careful geometric design in IP surveys and provides guidelines for optimising electrode configurations to obtain reliable results.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13918177
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of geometry on 3D Resistivity/IP surveys

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

The impact of geometry on 3D Resistivity/IP surveys

article en

Abstract

The Geometric Factor (k) can become infinite with a high spatial gradient for certain geometries used in Induced Polarisation (IP) surveys. This can lead to significant errors in computed apparent resistivities. Understanding the behaviour of the Geometric Factor for the different arrays used in mineral exploration is key to avoiding misleading interpretation of geoelectrical data. It is well known that at long offsets, high Geometric Factor values amplify low voltages to generate noisy apparent resistivities. However, at short offsets, equipotentials can represent an important source of noise. Practical solutions, such as varying the spacing between current electrodes or adjusting their positions along specific axes and changing the line spacing can be implemented to mitigate these geometry related issues. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of careful geometric design in IP surveys and provides guidelines for optimising electrode configurations to obtain reliable results.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
METabolic Explorer (France) (FR), Explore York (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of geometry on 3D Resistivity/IP surveys · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS