A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER ETHICS AND BIOETHICS

Bioinformatics has become a growing area of study and practice has sparked the convergence of bioethics and ethics of computer technology, the two primary strands of applied ethics in contemporary discourse. This convergence necessitates a methodological reflection on the fundamental principles defining bioethics and computer ethics, particularly in addressing normative challenges arising from technological advancements. Moor's argument advocating for the independence of computer ethics from traditional ethics is scrutinized within this context. The rise of bioinformatics further complicates this issue, blurring the distinction between computer ethics and bioethics is important to understand. It is contended that the initial demarcation between these ethical domains is arbitrary, leading to the proposition that the ethics of bioinformatics will likely maintain a provisional character. This abstract reflects us for overall exploration of the evolving interchange of bioethics, computer ethics, and bioinformatics, highlighting the need for ongoing integrative dialogue and flexible ethical frameworks.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13208505
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER ETHICS AND BIOETHICS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
article

A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER ETHICS AND BIOETHICS

article en

Abstract

Bioinformatics has become a growing area of study and practice has sparked the convergence of bioethics and ethics of computer technology, the two primary strands of applied ethics in contemporary discourse. This convergence necessitates a methodological reflection on the fundamental principles defining bioethics and computer ethics, particularly in addressing normative challenges arising from technological advancements. Moor's argument advocating for the independence of computer ethics from traditional ethics is scrutinized within this context. The rise of bioinformatics further complicates this issue, blurring the distinction between computer ethics and bioethics is important to understand. It is contended that the initial demarcation between these ethical domains is arbitrary, leading to the proposition that the ethics of bioinformatics will likely maintain a provisional character. This abstract reflects us for overall exploration of the evolving interchange of bioethics, computer ethics, and bioinformatics, highlighting the need for ongoing integrative dialogue and flexible ethical frameworks.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER ETHICS AND BIOETHICS · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS