Evaluation of Research Data File Errors - First Results

The digital preservation community is well acquainted with text publications, as well as file format identification and validation of these file types. In contrast, research data publications are becoming more frequent, introducing more or different kinds of format errors messages.The PUBLISSO – Repository for Life Sciences at ZB MED – Information Centre for Life Sciences contains both types of publication. In the process of transferring these to the digital preservation system, differences in file error messages and error handling emerged. This lightning talk intends to give a first view into the error types prominent for research data, comparing them to typical errors for text publications. It will focus specifically on those types of format validation and identification error messages that often indicate severe file errors. It will also introduce a possible approach to researching these error messages and their causes, as well as an example of resolving errors post-publication. Furthermore, it will raise various questions – such as ways to approach preservation actions that result in slight file changes and if these actions may already have an effect on research data integrity and technical compatibility with research software. It will also touch upon the question of handling relevant context material like standards which are not published alongside research data but may be necessary for its reusability in the long-term. Finally, it will give an overview of changes to our repository publication policy that have been introduced as a consequence of discussing these topics.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13683417
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Research Data File Errors - First Results

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Evaluation of Research Data File Errors - First Results

article en

Abstract

The digital preservation community is well acquainted with text publications, as well as file format identification and validation of these file types. In contrast, research data publications are becoming more frequent, introducing more or different kinds of format errors messages.The PUBLISSO – Repository for Life Sciences at ZB MED – Information Centre for Life Sciences contains both types of publication. In the process of transferring these to the digital preservation system, differences in file error messages and error handling emerged. This lightning talk intends to give a first view into the error types prominent for research data, comparing them to typical errors for text publications. It will focus specifically on those types of format validation and identification error messages that often indicate severe file errors. It will also introduce a possible approach to researching these error messages and their causes, as well as an example of resolving errors post-publication. Furthermore, it will raise various questions – such as ways to approach preservation actions that result in slight file changes and if these actions may already have an effect on research data integrity and technical compatibility with research software. It will also touch upon the question of handling relevant context material like standards which are not published alongside research data but may be necessary for its reusability in the long-term. Finally, it will give an overview of changes to our repository publication policy that have been introduced as a consequence of discussing these topics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.