Examining the Performance of the Bagging Method in Breast Cancer Classification

The aim of this study is to classify breast cancer using the Bagging classifier, which is among the Ensemble methods. To this end, the breast cancer dataset available on the Kaggle database was used. The dataset consists of 569 observations and 32 variables, with 212 (37.3 %) being benign and 357 (62.7 %) malignant. Initially, the gain ratio feature selection method was used to determine the important variables. Then, the performance of the method was examined according to the 2-fold, 5-fold, and 10-fold cross-validation methods with the number of variables used. The analyses were performed using the WEKA program. As a result of the analysis, both with all variables included and after removing insignificant variables, the performance metrics were determined as follows: accuracy was 95.0791, with precision, recall, and F-measure values of 0.951, and the ROC area value was 0.988. Moreover, it was observed that when all variables were used and when insignificant variables were removed, the method's performance was similar, except for the time variable, and it showed better performance compared to other variable numbers. Additionally, it can be said that the 2-fold cross-validation method showed slightly better classification performance in all metrics except for the ROC area measure. It is recommended that the Bagging method be used in the classification of different diseases.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13335496
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Performance of the Bagging Method in Breast Cancer Classification

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
AI in cancer detection
article

Examining the Performance of the Bagging Method in Breast Cancer Classification

article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to classify breast cancer using the Bagging classifier, which is among the Ensemble methods. To this end, the breast cancer dataset available on the Kaggle database was used. The dataset consists of 569 observations and 32 variables, with 212 (37.3 %) being benign and 357 (62.7 %) malignant. Initially, the gain ratio feature selection method was used to determine the important variables. Then, the performance of the method was examined according to the 2-fold, 5-fold, and 10-fold cross-validation methods with the number of variables used. The analyses were performed using the WEKA program. As a result of the analysis, both with all variables included and after removing insignificant variables, the performance metrics were determined as follows: accuracy was 95.0791, with precision, recall, and F-measure values of 0.951, and the ROC area value was 0.988. Moreover, it was observed that when all variables were used and when insignificant variables were removed, the method's performance was similar, except for the time variable, and it showed better performance compared to other variable numbers. Additionally, it can be said that the 2-fold cross-validation method showed slightly better classification performance in all metrics except for the ROC area measure. It is recommended that the Bagging method be used in the classification of different diseases.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Batman University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.