Investigating Linguistic Abilities of LLMs for Native Language Identification

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art results in native language identification (NLI). However, these models often depend on superficial features, such as cultural references and self-disclosed information in the document, rather than capturing the underlying linguistic structures. In this work, we evaluate the linguistic abilities of open-source LLMs by evaluating their performance in NLI through content-independent features, such as POS n-grams, function words, and punctuation marks, and compare their performance against traditional machine learning approaches. Our experiments reveal that while LLM's initial performance on structural features (55.2% accuracy) falls significantly below their performance on full text (96.5%), fine-tuning significantly improves their capabilities, enabling state-of-the-art results with strong cross-domain generalization.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-274933
Primary Topic
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Linguistic Abilities of LLMs for Native Language Identification

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
article

Investigating Linguistic Abilities of LLMs for Native Language Identification

article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art results in native language identification (NLI). However, these models often depend on superficial features, such as cultural references and self-disclosed information in the document, rather than capturing the underlying linguistic structures. In this work, we evaluate the linguistic abilities of open-source LLMs by evaluating their performance in NLI through content-independent features, such as POS n-grams, function words, and punctuation marks, and compare their performance against traditional machine learning approaches. Our experiments reveal that while LLM's initial performance on structural features (55.2% accuracy) falls significantly below their performance on full text (96.5%), fine-tuning significantly improves their capabilities, enabling state-of-the-art results with strong cross-domain generalization.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.