A Balancing Act : How Media Professionals Perceive the Implementation of News Recommender Systems

News recommender systems (NRS), the algorithmic automation and personalization of news recommendations, may benefit both media producers and users. Yet, they raise concerns about the quality, diversity, and responsibility of journalism. Despite growing research, empirical investigations on news media’s employment of NRS have remained scarce, particularly in small media markets and across different organizational types. To better understand how and why news organizations implement NRS, what benefits and concerns media professionals see, and how the perceived impact of NRS relates to how media professionals imagine their audience, we conducted qualitative interviews with 36 media professionals across two national contexts (CH and NL) and different types of news organizations. Overall, media professionals see the implementation of NRS as a balancing act between co-orientation with and demarcation from other news organizations and intermediaries. The perceived impact on users depends on media professionals’ imagined audiences.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-266155
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Balancing Act : How Media Professionals Perceive the Implementation of News Recommender Systems

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Media Studies and Communication
article

A Balancing Act : How Media Professionals Perceive the Implementation of News Recommender Systems

article en

Abstract

News recommender systems (NRS), the algorithmic automation and personalization of news recommendations, may benefit both media producers and users. Yet, they raise concerns about the quality, diversity, and responsibility of journalism. Despite growing research, empirical investigations on news media’s employment of NRS have remained scarce, particularly in small media markets and across different organizational types. To better understand how and why news organizations implement NRS, what benefits and concerns media professionals see, and how the perceived impact of NRS relates to how media professionals imagine their audience, we conducted qualitative interviews with 36 media professionals across two national contexts (CH and NL) and different types of news organizations. Overall, media professionals see the implementation of NRS as a balancing act between co-orientation with and demarcation from other news organizations and intermediaries. The perceived impact on users depends on media professionals’ imagined audiences.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Balancing Act : How Media Professionals Perceive the Implementation of News Recommender Systems · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS