The Influence of Interdental Brushes and Toothpaste On Approximal Enamel and Dentine Abrasion - A Laboratory Study

PURPOSE To investigate the approximal abrasive enamel and dentine wear using interdental brushes (IDBs) with and without toothpaste in a novel standardised in-vitro set-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-two bovine enamel and 72 dentine specimens were prepared and randomly allocated into 12 groups (odd group: dentine; even group: enamel). The specimens were brushed with three IDB types of ISO 2 (Curaprox (CPS09, groups 1-4), Elmex (size 2, groups 5-8) and Circum (Circum 2, groups 9-12)) with artificial saliva or toothpaste slurry (Colgate Total Original). A custom-made brushing device simulated interdental brushing for 1 h on dentine (7,200 strokes) and 6 h on enamel (43,200 strokes). Wear was assessed using a contact profilometer, and electron microscopy images were taken. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS The combination of IDBs with artificial saliva resulted in enamel and dentine wear below the detection limit, similar to the enamel wear when toothpaste was used. Dentine specimens showed significant abrasive wear, which was influenced by the IDBs' design as follows: Curaprox (median ± interquartile range (IQR): 8.6 ± 1.0 µm), Circum (9.7 ± 2.9 µm), and Elmex (18.8 ± 9.1 µm). The difference in wear between Curaprox and Circum was not statistically significant (P = 1). However, the increase in the wear of Elmex compared with that of the other IDBs was significant (P 0 0.001). CONCLUSION The use of IDBs with toothpaste may cause statistically significant dentine wear and should not be recommended in combination. Appropriate instructions are essential.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-277692
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Interdental Brushes and Toothpaste On Approximal Enamel and Dentine Abrasion - A Laboratory Study

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

The Influence of Interdental Brushes and Toothpaste On Approximal Enamel and Dentine Abrasion - A Laboratory Study

article en

Abstract

PURPOSE To investigate the approximal abrasive enamel and dentine wear using interdental brushes (IDBs) with and without toothpaste in a novel standardised in-vitro set-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-two bovine enamel and 72 dentine specimens were prepared and randomly allocated into 12 groups (odd group: dentine; even group: enamel). The specimens were brushed with three IDB types of ISO 2 (Curaprox (CPS09, groups 1-4), Elmex (size 2, groups 5-8) and Circum (Circum 2, groups 9-12)) with artificial saliva or toothpaste slurry (Colgate Total Original). A custom-made brushing device simulated interdental brushing for 1 h on dentine (7,200 strokes) and 6 h on enamel (43,200 strokes). Wear was assessed using a contact profilometer, and electron microscopy images were taken. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS The combination of IDBs with artificial saliva resulted in enamel and dentine wear below the detection limit, similar to the enamel wear when toothpaste was used. Dentine specimens showed significant abrasive wear, which was influenced by the IDBs' design as follows: Curaprox (median ± interquartile range (IQR): 8.6 ± 1.0 µm), Circum (9.7 ± 2.9 µm), and Elmex (18.8 ± 9.1 µm). The difference in wear between Curaprox and Circum was not statistically significant (P = 1). However, the increase in the wear of Elmex compared with that of the other IDBs was significant (P 0 0.001). CONCLUSION The use of IDBs with toothpaste may cause statistically significant dentine wear and should not be recommended in combination. Appropriate instructions are essential.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.