Collaborative creation and management of rich FAIR metadata: Two case studies from robotics field research

This paper presents lessons learned from the creation and management of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data and metadata in two recent robotics projects, in order to derive principles and building blocks for collaborative (meta)data management in field research. First, an inventory of metadata purposes and topics is presented, distinguishing between executive metadata necessary for data producers, and rich reusable metadata satisfying the FAIR principles. A model of the metadata creation process is developed and compared with the Metadata4Ing ontology. Second, social aspects of FAIR research data management (RDM) are discussed in the project context and beyond. The primary tasks of a FAIR research data manager are analyzed in three domains: data production team, research domain, and FAIR RDM community. Third, some improvements on prominent data lifecycle models are proposed to support the requirements of collaborative RDM, and to foster an iterative improvement of RDM systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TUjournals
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48694/inggrid.4296
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborative creation and management of rich FAIR metadata: Two case studies from robotics field research

TUjournals
Research Data Management Practices
article

Collaborative creation and management of rich FAIR metadata: Two case studies from robotics field research

article en

Abstract

This paper presents lessons learned from the creation and management of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data and metadata in two recent robotics projects, in order to derive principles and building blocks for collaborative (meta)data management in field research. First, an inventory of metadata purposes and topics is presented, distinguishing between executive metadata necessary for data producers, and rich reusable metadata satisfying the FAIR principles. A model of the metadata creation process is developed and compared with the Metadata4Ing ontology. Second, social aspects of FAIR research data management (RDM) are discussed in the project context and beyond. The primary tasks of a FAIR research data manager are analyzed in three domains: data production team, research domain, and FAIR RDM community. Third, some improvements on prominent data lifecycle models are proposed to support the requirements of collaborative RDM, and to foster an iterative improvement of RDM systems.

TUjournals
German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), Institut für Technische Beratung und Produktentwicklung (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Collaborative creation and management of rich FAIR metadata: Two case studies from robotics field research · TUjournals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS