Evaluation of dynamic computer-assisted implant placement accuracy by means of a novel digital method: a feasibility clinical study.

Purpose To present a novel digital method to evaluate dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (dCAIS) accuracy comparing digital implant planning to real implant position.Materials And Methods Twenty patients in need of implant supported single unit-crowns (SUC), were consequently treated following a standardized digital protocol encompassing (1) a diagnostic digital intra-oral scan (IOS), (2) a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), (3) 3D digital implant planning, (4) dynamic navigated implant placement (X-Guide, X-Nav Technologies, LLC, Lansdale, PA, USA) and (5) a post-operative IOS with the scan body in situ. Implant position accuracy was evaluated by superimposing the post-operative IOS with the pre-operative digital planning and calculating the resulting angular deviation (o), global head deviation (mm) and global tip deviation (mm).Results From the original 30 installed implants, 29 could be analyzed. All surgical procedures were successfully completed without any complication. The calculated mean angular deviation was 4.50° ± 2.59°, while the mean deviation at the implant head was 1.18 ± 0.52 mm. Finally, the global tip deviation was 1.43 ± 0.78 mm. Flapless implant placement was significantly associated with a reduction in both head and tip linear deviations (p = 0.026; p = 0.007), as well as with a significant reduction in angular deviation (p < 0.001). Implants placed in the anterior region showed a mean statistically significantly higher deviation at the implant head compared to those in posterior sites (difference: 0.39 mm; p = 0.043).Conclusions Despite its limitations, the proposed digital method does represent a promising and patient friendly approach to evaluate dCAIS accuracy.Clinical Significance The proposed digital method represents a promising workflow for the evaluation of dCAIS implant placement avoiding the need of post-operative radiations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/90561
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of dynamic computer-assisted implant placement accuracy by means of a novel digital method: a feasibility clinical study.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Evaluation of dynamic computer-assisted implant placement accuracy by means of a novel digital method: a feasibility clinical study.

article en

Abstract

Purpose To present a novel digital method to evaluate dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (dCAIS) accuracy comparing digital implant planning to real implant position.Materials And Methods Twenty patients in need of implant supported single unit-crowns (SUC), were consequently treated following a standardized digital protocol encompassing (1) a diagnostic digital intra-oral scan (IOS), (2) a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), (3) 3D digital implant planning, (4) dynamic navigated implant placement (X-Guide, X-Nav Technologies, LLC, Lansdale, PA, USA) and (5) a post-operative IOS with the scan body in situ. Implant position accuracy was evaluated by superimposing the post-operative IOS with the pre-operative digital planning and calculating the resulting angular deviation (o), global head deviation (mm) and global tip deviation (mm).Results From the original 30 installed implants, 29 could be analyzed. All surgical procedures were successfully completed without any complication. The calculated mean angular deviation was 4.50° ± 2.59°, while the mean deviation at the implant head was 1.18 ± 0.52 mm. Finally, the global tip deviation was 1.43 ± 0.78 mm. Flapless implant placement was significantly associated with a reduction in both head and tip linear deviations (p = 0.026; p = 0.007), as well as with a significant reduction in angular deviation (p < 0.001). Implants placed in the anterior region showed a mean statistically significantly higher deviation at the implant head compared to those in posterior sites (difference: 0.39 mm; p = 0.043).Conclusions Despite its limitations, the proposed digital method does represent a promising and patient friendly approach to evaluate dCAIS accuracy.Clinical Significance The proposed digital method represents a promising workflow for the evaluation of dCAIS implant placement avoiding the need of post-operative radiations.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University of Dental Medicine (MM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of dynamic computer-assisted implant placement accuracy by means of a novel digital method: a feasibility clinical study. · Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS