Ectomycorrhizas and tropical soils: the importance of sampling scale and the recognition of ecosystem feedback

Post-publication 'Matters Arising' article. In a recent paper, Medina-Vega et al. (2024)1 claim that there are no general effects of soil nutrients on abundance of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) tree species across tropical rain forests. Results from an African site, Korup, where the hypothesis was tested in detail before—and provided strong supporting evidence for soil effects, are miscited and misused in their study. Medina-Vega et al. (2024)1 fail to apply the appropriate scale of field sampling, and they do not adequately recognize feedback effects of ECM trees on the soils. There are important confounding factors which also invalidate their conclusion. It is argued here that only where site-specific detailed studies use soil gradients and local ± ECM vegetation patches, can the effects of soils-on-trees versus those of trees-on-soils be estimated independently. Broad generalizations provide little insight into tree-soil processes which will differ between sites in various ways because each ecosystem operates under its own contingent conditions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/87351
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ectomycorrhizas and tropical soils: the importance of sampling scale and the recognition of ecosystem feedback

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Ectomycorrhizas and tropical soils: the importance of sampling scale and the recognition of ecosystem feedback

article en

Abstract

Post-publication 'Matters Arising' article. In a recent paper, Medina-Vega et al. (2024)1 claim that there are no general effects of soil nutrients on abundance of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) tree species across tropical rain forests. Results from an African site, Korup, where the hypothesis was tested in detail before—and provided strong supporting evidence for soil effects, are miscited and misused in their study. Medina-Vega et al. (2024)1 fail to apply the appropriate scale of field sampling, and they do not adequately recognize feedback effects of ECM trees on the soils. There are important confounding factors which also invalidate their conclusion. It is argued here that only where site-specific detailed studies use soil gradients and local ± ECM vegetation patches, can the effects of soils-on-trees versus those of trees-on-soils be estimated independently. Broad generalizations provide little insight into tree-soil processes which will differ between sites in various ways because each ecosystem operates under its own contingent conditions.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Fincantieri (Italy) (IT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.