Prognostic value of ABO blood groups in upfront operated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.

Purpose Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been shown to have a lower incidence in patients with blood group O. It is currently uncertain if patients with group O have a better prognosis after pancreatectomy. This study assessed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of PDAC patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy based on ABO blood groups. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed including patients from two university centers. All consecutive head PDAC patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy from 2000 to 2016 were included. OS and DFS were compared between blood groups A, B, AB, and O using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Results A total of 438 patients were included (215 women, median age 67). Pre- and intraoperative details were comparable between all subgroups. Median OS did not differ between the four blood groups (A: 23 months, 95% CI 18-28; B: 32, 95% CI 20-44; AB: 37, 95% CI 18-56 and O: 26, 95% CI 20-32, p = 0.192). Median DFS were also similar (A: 19 months, 95% CI 15-23; B: 26, 95% CI 19-33; AB: 35, 95% CI 15-55 and O: 22, 95% CI 15-29, p = 0.441). There was no OS difference between O and non-O groups (median: 26 months, 95% CI 20-33 vs. 25 months, 95% CI 20-30, p = 0.773). On multivariable analysis blood groups were not prognostic of OS. Only lymph node involvement, tumor differentiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion OS and DFS were similar between all four blood groups after pancreatoduodenectomy. Independent predictors of OS were associated with tumor characteristics and adjuvant treatment.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/17192
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic value of ABO blood groups in upfront operated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Blood groups and transfusion
article

Prognostic value of ABO blood groups in upfront operated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.

article en

Abstract

Purpose Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been shown to have a lower incidence in patients with blood group O. It is currently uncertain if patients with group O have a better prognosis after pancreatectomy. This study assessed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of PDAC patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy based on ABO blood groups. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed including patients from two university centers. All consecutive head PDAC patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy from 2000 to 2016 were included. OS and DFS were compared between blood groups A, B, AB, and O using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Results A total of 438 patients were included (215 women, median age 67). Pre- and intraoperative details were comparable between all subgroups. Median OS did not differ between the four blood groups (A: 23 months, 95% CI 18-28; B: 32, 95% CI 20-44; AB: 37, 95% CI 18-56 and O: 26, 95% CI 20-32, p = 0.192). Median DFS were also similar (A: 19 months, 95% CI 15-23; B: 26, 95% CI 19-33; AB: 35, 95% CI 15-55 and O: 22, 95% CI 15-29, p = 0.441). There was no OS difference between O and non-O groups (median: 26 months, 95% CI 20-33 vs. 25 months, 95% CI 20-30, p = 0.773). On multivariable analysis blood groups were not prognostic of OS. Only lymph node involvement, tumor differentiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion OS and DFS were similar between all four blood groups after pancreatoduodenectomy. Independent predictors of OS were associated with tumor characteristics and adjuvant treatment.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.