An approach to implementing patient and public involvement in investigator-initiated clinical trials.

As patient and public involvement (PPI) in academic clinical research, especially clinical trials, is gaining recognition, including acceptance and implementation, questions arise about how to establish an effective "basic framework for PPI in academic clinical research" for all stakeholders in Switzerland. In this Viewpoint, the authors focus on one aspect of the survey and interview results reported by Eberle and colleagues from PPI contributors, researchers, academic research infrastructure staff, and representatives of regulatory and funding bodies to identify a possible direction for a basic PPI framework in Switzerland. Specifically, they describe how they prepare two groups of stakeholders - clinical researchers and PPI contributors - for collaboration. They present clear definitional distinctions to help clinical researchers prepare for the 2025 call for proposals from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials (IICT) and provide important background information that is essential for understanding the fundamentals of PPI.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/88871
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An approach to implementing patient and public involvement in investigator-initiated clinical trials.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

An approach to implementing patient and public involvement in investigator-initiated clinical trials.

article en

Abstract

As patient and public involvement (PPI) in academic clinical research, especially clinical trials, is gaining recognition, including acceptance and implementation, questions arise about how to establish an effective "basic framework for PPI in academic clinical research" for all stakeholders in Switzerland. In this Viewpoint, the authors focus on one aspect of the survey and interview results reported by Eberle and colleagues from PPI contributors, researchers, academic research infrastructure staff, and representatives of regulatory and funding bodies to identify a possible direction for a basic PPI framework in Switzerland. Specifically, they describe how they prepare two groups of stakeholders - clinical researchers and PPI contributors - for collaboration. They present clear definitional distinctions to help clinical researchers prepare for the 2025 call for proposals from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials (IICT) and provide important background information that is essential for understanding the fundamentals of PPI.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Institute of Clinical Research (US), Clinical Trials New Zealand (NZ), Clinical Research Management (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An approach to implementing patient and public involvement in investigator-initiated clinical trials. · Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS