Phenomenology and Translation: Exploring Roman Ingarden’s Spots of Indeterminacy Impact on Literary Translation

Abstract: The present study investigates the concept of spots of indeterminacy as coined by Roman Ingarden in his theory of the reader experience. Ingarden perceives the typology of the literary text to be marked with spots of indeterminacy, which are to be “filled” by the reader in his quest to concretize the aesthetic experience. Needless to argue, here, the relevance of this theory in the understanding of translation process where reading plays an intrinsic role. The research is a probe into the nature of the translator’s task in his attempt to balance between their own concretization of the aesthetic experience and the preservation of the potential concretizations comprised in the source text. Ergo, in order to explore the nature of such a challenge, two different approaches are discussed; the first is Hans- Georg Gadamer’s notion of highlighting and clarification, while the second is Umberto Eco’s principle of negotiation. The study concludes that Eco’s approach to indeterminacy spots is more selective and relative than Gadamer’s, emphasizing the target reader’s active role in shaping the aesthetic experience, though never identical to the source text. Keywords: Phenomenology, hermeneutics, literary translation, Spots of indeterminacy.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48734/akofena.n015.vol.5.07.2025
Primary Topic
Umberto Eco and Semiotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenomenology and Translation: Exploring Roman Ingarden’s Spots of Indeterminacy Impact on Literary Translation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Umberto Eco and Semiotics
article

Phenomenology and Translation: Exploring Roman Ingarden’s Spots of Indeterminacy Impact on Literary Translation

article en

Abstract

Abstract: The present study investigates the concept of spots of indeterminacy as coined by Roman Ingarden in his theory of the reader experience. Ingarden perceives the typology of the literary text to be marked with spots of indeterminacy, which are to be “filled” by the reader in his quest to concretize the aesthetic experience. Needless to argue, here, the relevance of this theory in the understanding of translation process where reading plays an intrinsic role. The research is a probe into the nature of the translator’s task in his attempt to balance between their own concretization of the aesthetic experience and the preservation of the potential concretizations comprised in the source text. Ergo, in order to explore the nature of such a challenge, two different approaches are discussed; the first is Hans- Georg Gadamer’s notion of highlighting and clarification, while the second is Umberto Eco’s principle of negotiation. The study concludes that Eco’s approach to indeterminacy spots is more selective and relative than Gadamer’s, emphasizing the target reader’s active role in shaping the aesthetic experience, though never identical to the source text. Keywords: Phenomenology, hermeneutics, literary translation, Spots of indeterminacy.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Umberto Eco and Semiotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.