A Retrospective Analysis of 8457 Glossectomy Cases Over 15 Years-The Boon and Bane of Radical Neck Dissection.

Background Glossectomy is a commonly performed procedure in head and neck oncology, primarily for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Radical neck dissection (RND) is still being combined with glossectomy to manage lymph node metastases, yet its impact on postoperative outcomes in glossectomy patients remains largely underexplored.Methods This study utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) to analyze 30-day postoperative outcomes in 8457 patients who underwent partial or extended glossectomy, with or without concurrent RND, between 2008 and 2022.Results No significant differences in 30-day postoperative complications were found between partial and extended glossectomy groups (P=0.571). However, extended glossectomy with concurrent RND was associated with longer operative times (P<0.001), increased length of hospital stay (P=0.045), and higher complication rates (P=0.008). In partial glossectomy patients, concurrent RND was linked to higher 30-day mortality (P=0.022). Multivariable analysis identified smoking status, obesity, and inpatient setting as significant risk factors for postoperative complications across all subgroups.Conclusion While the extent of glossectomy did not influence immediate postoperative outcomes, concurrent RND significantly increased complication risks in extended glossectomy patients. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized risk assessment and tailored surgical planning to enhance patient outcomes in glossectomy procedures.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/87744
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Retrospective Analysis of 8457 Glossectomy Cases Over 15 Years-The Boon and Bane of Radical Neck Dissection.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

A Retrospective Analysis of 8457 Glossectomy Cases Over 15 Years-The Boon and Bane of Radical Neck Dissection.

article en

Abstract

Background Glossectomy is a commonly performed procedure in head and neck oncology, primarily for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Radical neck dissection (RND) is still being combined with glossectomy to manage lymph node metastases, yet its impact on postoperative outcomes in glossectomy patients remains largely underexplored.Methods This study utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) to analyze 30-day postoperative outcomes in 8457 patients who underwent partial or extended glossectomy, with or without concurrent RND, between 2008 and 2022.Results No significant differences in 30-day postoperative complications were found between partial and extended glossectomy groups (P=0.571). However, extended glossectomy with concurrent RND was associated with longer operative times (P<0.001), increased length of hospital stay (P=0.045), and higher complication rates (P=0.008). In partial glossectomy patients, concurrent RND was linked to higher 30-day mortality (P=0.022). Multivariable analysis identified smoking status, obesity, and inpatient setting as significant risk factors for postoperative complications across all subgroups.Conclusion While the extent of glossectomy did not influence immediate postoperative outcomes, concurrent RND significantly increased complication risks in extended glossectomy patients. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized risk assessment and tailored surgical planning to enhance patient outcomes in glossectomy procedures.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Florida Craniofacial Institute (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.